The one preaching freedom but discrediting the others, while this can point to both, only one side does so because the opponent is hateful and intolerant. No tolerance for intolerance, isn't a paradoxon. However both sides aren't immune to extremism, so it's on each person's duty to fight back when blind group thinking immerges. We all believe we're immune to going the wrong way, but it actually takes time and dedication, questioning your own motivation, to avoid fallacies. In perspective of both, the side they believe in is in the right, but only one on is destroying out of spit. It needs a fool to believe in both being equally bad, ignoring details of severity. Taking away an extremists voice, who's spreading hate, isn't suppression.
I'm against blocklists because they cause the internet to embody the Dark Forest hypothesis.
If someone decides to put you on one you aren't informed, you can't reason with them, and there's usually no way off it and you're just like, not able to engage with a huge heap of people because whoever manages the list says so.
There's an anti AI/NFT blocklist for bsky and I don't use it just because I feel that strongly about the risk of false positives