Yeah, I get that much, but I'm not sure what the implication of the original comment is.
Like, are they implying Biden should call a hit on Trump? Should he just not cede the presidency? These are things the typical Lemmy user (as I've seen at least) would RAGE against under any other circumstances, so I'm inclined to assume thats not the case. But if not that, then what?
Interesting.
I do find myself missing the subtle points of comments, esp in the more lefty areas of the fediverse. I hope I'm not breaking any rules when I ask. I am genuinely interested.
I tend to prefer monk class for DND and other TTRPGs, but no, I've never gone by that user name.
I don't follow what you're implying with this. Can you explain what you mean?
I think its great to be reading the amount of "in hindsight, screwing over Bernie Sanders over the last decade was probably a mistake" (mostly seeing this in the centrist/slightly liberal circles I inhabit)
I have to second this one.
Most of the people I hang with tend towards 3rd party. All of them proudly touted their votes for the democratic candidate in this/the last election, but each was also very clear they were only voting that way as a way to vote against Trump.
They all hate Biden and Harris.
Oh.
Welp, my opinion still stands, even if this isn't the right context for it.
Hmmm, that does seem weird that they wouldnt be putting in DRM. I guess I'm on board with it. They do make super solid games. I hope this showcases what can be achieved by games that do t include DRM at their core.
Anti-cheat in single player games never made sense to me. Maybe if it includes microtransactions, then i guess i could see a use case, but like, if I want to cheat at your single player game, what use would there be in stopping me?
How did you make that moat? I'd love to have that feature in my bases.
I don't always need to see this at the end of the week...
...but I am super glad to see it when I need it.
Keep up the good work my guy.
I like the words, but I'm worried it sends the wrong message having a moose crossing railroad tracks? Like, a moose is super wholesome for this, but yo, that train is pretty stronk too, ya know?
I think OP put the wrong IMDB link.
I really like your way of explaining that.
It still feels dirty, but when is war and geopolitics ever actually clean? I feel a lot more heartened that this was the right choice after reading your response.
I understand the sanctions part and wanting to head off any potential state interference with projects like this, but "infosec reasons" feels very hand wavy.
I think I'd be a lot more comfortable if we had seen malicious/bad faith actions/communications or maybe some more specific and tangible reasons to suspect them being compromised on the part of the Russian maintainers before they were just removed.
Based on just the headline, you're probably not wrong, but reading the article, you'll see that those are anti-ballistic missile missiles (which is to say, they are missiles used to shoot down other missiles).
There's definitely something to be said about the U.S. support for Israel, but this feels like the most sane and agreeable area of support that could be provided.
Awesome project; super easy to set up the streams in VLC for anyone curious about that.
Their brutish trolls
Def misread this as their British trolls, a misinterpretation I fully support.
you could stand up and fight for that
For best results, do not do spontaneously (that is, go grab some friends and coworkers before attempting to take on a big business)