Jack Smith’s big new Jan. 6 brief is a major indictment of the Supreme Court
Jack Smith’s big new Jan. 6 brief is a major indictment of the Supreme Court
slate.com
Jack Smith’s Big New Jan. 6 Brief Is a Major Indictment of the Supreme Court
22 comments
-
-
Moscow Mitch has always given in to foreign pressure to help Weird 34. The Turtle's hypocrisy isn't much of a surprise. Shame on Kentucky voters that voted for McConnell and against America.
Garland would have been a better SCOTUS Justice than the Attorney General. If only we had someone better ready to move faster. But even if he had, wouldn't SCOTUS have still stopped him? Hard to know for sure.
We now know that Chief Justice Roberts is pro autocracy. His actions speak louder than his words. He thinks and has ruled that the President should have more power in the USA than the old kings of England had over their people and parliament. A king who is immune. Charles I got hung for thinking he had less power than what Roberts has granted Weird 34.
From the article: "There is a risk of authoritarianism down the line."
I disagree. A Dementia Don win is an inevitability that we'll have an autocrat in charge. Roberts may want to reflect on the monster he's created, especially if the autocrat gets his way and dismisses SCOTUS as easily as dismissing the Constitution.
-
SCOUTS:
:(
-
-
Everytime I try to open the article the firefox tab crashes. what gives? I've been seeing this happen a lot recently
-
I'm using FF & don't have that issue nor have I elsewhere.
Sometime extensions cause issues if you have any installed.
-
updated my extensions and browser, now it works, oops!
-
-
It's a sadness, but I also have occasional issues with Firefox. It's still the best browser by far, but its share is so small, more and more developers aren't testing their pages in Firefox any more.
Doesn't make no never mind to me. If a page doesn't work in Firefox, I can do without.
-
22 comments
If memory serves, the French invented a huge apparatus for that, inspired by a bread slicer.
The best thing since sliced nobility
Annual reminder that the SCOTUS decided that the SCOTUS has the power of Constitutional review.
they should just require a randomly selected jury for any ruling and the justices only job should be deciding what to present to jurors
I'm not sure I'd like to trust a random jury to determine the interpretation of laws