ChatGPT is changing the way we write. Here’s how – and why it’s a problem.
ChatGPT is changing the way we write. Here’s how – and why it’s a problem.
theconversation.com
ChatGPT is changing the way we write. Here’s how – and why it’s a problem
42 comments
-
-
We can't blame chatgpt for the change in headline writing over the last few years, though.
-
Maybe we need LLMs to (first of all, we don't need LLMs for this) rewrite headlines any time the word "slams" gets in there.
-
Writers Slam The One Thing They Hate About AI.
-
-
-
And another thing! Kids these days aren't learning cursive handwriting. It's the death of culture, I tell you.
-
There’s this podcast I used to enjoy (I still enjoy it, but they stopped making new episodes) called Build For Tomorrow (previously known as The Pessimists Archive).
It’s all about times in the past where people have freaked out about stuff changing but it all turned out okay.
After having listened to every single episode — some multiple times — I’ve got this sinking feeling that just mocking the worries of the past misses a few important things.
- The paradox of risk management. If you have a valid concern, and we collectively do something to respond to it and prevent the damage, it ends up looking as if you were worried over nothing.
- Even for inventions that are, overall, beneficial, they can still bring new bad things with them. You can acknowledge both parts at once. When you invent trains, you also invent train crashes. When you invent electricity, you also invent electrocution. That doesn’t mean you need to reject the whole idea, but you need to respond to the new problems.
- There are plenty of cases where we have unleashed horrors onto the world while mocking the objections of the pessimists. Lead, PFAS, CFCs, radium paint, etc.
I’m not so sure that the concerns about AI “killing culture” actually are as overblown as the worry about cursive, or record players, or whatever. The closest comparison we have is probably the printing press. And things got so weird with that so quickly that the government claimed a monopoly on it. This could actually be a problem.
-
you know how banks will say "Past performance of financial securities does not represent potential future performance" or whatever: this is much the same thing. There are plenty of things that people freaked out about that turned out to be nothing much. There are plenty of things that people did not freak out about when they really should have. People are basically shit about telling the difference between them.
-
While i do get this vibe from the headline, the article actually closes with a call to be mindful of the shortcomings of generative AI (while using it)
-
-
My favorite tell is when a write-up starts with a verbose explanation of given knowledge on a subject. Yes, we all know what 'World Wide Web' and 'Internal Combustion Engines' are.
Get to the f'ing point.
-
-
Ironically, one of the nice uses I'm finding for AI is auto-summaries of exactly that sort of overly verbose article (or more often, Youtube video).
-
Whether it's text or video, there will always be a "Let me tell you about that time when I was on vacation" before the damn pot roast recipe or "Subscribe and play Raid Shadow Legends" followed by a 15 min padding.
-
-
That's become, by far, the most obvious tell for AI generated content for me. It's just so damn unnatural.
-
-
Seriously, fuck off with the AI shit. At best it's intelligent regex. And "intelligence" here means a specific thing.
-
i prefer the upgraded autocomplete analogy but yeah
-
What on Earth would that look like?
Your statement doesn't even make sense it's like saying it's not intelligent it's just a magic pen. Eh?
-
intelligent regex
That would be much, much worse than what we actually have. Complex regex are positively Lovecraftian. You'd be chanting "Ia! Ia! Cthulhu ftaghn!" before you knew it.
-
Biggest issue I see is that these LLMs tend to repeat themselves after a surprisingly short number of times (unless they're sufficiently bloated like ChatGPT).
If you ask any of the users of Sillytavern or RisuAI they'll tell you that these things have a long tail of not being very creative.
-
👌👍
42 comments
Author: “write me a 4000 word article on why microplastics are bad
ChatGPT: generates 4000 words of text explaining what micro means, what plastic means, and paraphrasing the “controversy” section of the Wikipedia page on microplastics
Reader: “Summarise this article”
GhatGPT: “Microplastics are bad”
And in reality: https://chatgpt.com/share/66f519a6-1348-8002-96eb-bb61fb25287b
woah woah woah, lets have less of this looking at reality here. We all know generative AI is a fad that never works for anything and anyone using it is an idiot, we don't need to have our prejudices challenged