I mean it's also socialist, with how it's developed and distributed. Despite capitalists making use of it too. It's one of the few things in this world the people truly own collectively.
Capitalists making use of and profiting from socialist programs and structure is a tale as old as capitalism.
Pharma as an example. Crowdsourced research, government funding with money from the people only to be bought by a capitalist corpo where they do the last 10% of the work by industrialization, jack up the price by 1000x, and take 100% of the profits and don't even pay back their fair share in taxes, and then get a state-sponsered monopoly for an outrageous period.
In my experience, Linux folks are just happy to find each other in the wild.
Hell, I'm just happy to meet people that are Linux-curious lol.
It's mostly online that the distro wars are fought.
It's the same with leftists in my experience. The fighting is worst online
Yeah cause you have to say that insane shit to someone's face and you know you'll sound like an unhinged fuck
The terminally online mentally unwell people make it a different experience.
I've never met a linux enthusiast or even a user IRL. So at this point if I ever do, they will achieve best friend status off of that alone.
So strange that an operating system has that affect on me
I got a colleague last year, but he is the only one.
Super nice to have Proxmox/Docker/Portainer discussions at work.
Hope you find a new best friend soon!
2025 would be the year of Linux, if we could finally agree, that:
- Fedora,
- rust,
- systemd,
- wayland,
- pipewire,
- gtk,
- Gnome,
- nano,
- flatpak, and
- light mode
is the perfect stack of technology and configuration and that we do not need anything else. But no, you guys just had to disagree, and here we are ...
I'm with you all the way, really, except that, truly, KDE plasma and dark mode are the superior choices, obviously :)
For most people yes. The only things I would say are more personal choices are nano, Gnome, and light mode
So, i don't know if this is sarcasm or not
Surprised how, of all the people who took the bait, not a single one of them complained about systemd.
My beard isn't long enough to have an opinion about systemd. All I know is all my homies hate systemd for some reason.
A lot of complaints I've seen is that it's bloated - it's not only a system manager but also has a DNS relay, network manager, container manager, and so on.
That said, codifying service startup and managing them with cgroups is IMO MUCH better than init scripts that think running
killall apacheis a good way to stop a service.
Disagree on gnome and nano KDE and Micro supremacy
Fuck light mode
I want the kernel to be more rusty!
light mode? hello satan. also, let's swap gnome to cinnamon. and fedora to mint.
🍿
- openSUSE better
- yes (zig is good too)
- dinit
- yes
- yes
- Qt
- cosmic (when it's done)
- Emacs
- flatpaks are good at their job, but I want system packages too
- dark mode is infinitely better
Nano ?!
Counterpoint it would be the year of the Linux desktop if we all agreed on
- Artix
- OpenRC
- Wayland (but different implementation)
- pulseaudio
- non-gnome gtk
- Hyprland
- Vim
- AUR
- dark mode always
nanowith the new, alternative "GUI editor standard" keybinds or the oldpicoones?I beg to slightly differ, but it's a good take overall:
- Aeon Desktop or Fedora Silverblue, any sane immutable system, really
- Zig + Rust + Scheme / Clojure
- systemd,
- wayland,
- pipewire,
- gtk,
- Gnome,
- nano / gedit / whatever y'all are using instead of glorious Emacs
- flatpak,
- distrobox
- light mode
Oh! So close, Honey. We're looking for vim and dark-mode. But thanks for playing.
Kde is better tho
I will switch to Gnome when it can handle multiple workspaces on multiple displays properly. The fact that I can't have multiple independent workspaces for each display is a complete deal breaker for me.
Linux Developers: "Here's the thing, you're not going to force all of us to learn Rust."
This meme couldn't be any more fucking accurate.
Lol. If Rust fans want a Rust kernel, no one is stopping them from building one.
It's hard to overcome the Hurd problem though. Although it would be fascinating to see how it would diverge on the design of the Linux kernel. How much can you still act like Linux while not being Linux? Or would it just be a direct algorithmic translation, basically doing the same processes under the hood with the same architecture? I'm sure there's more than a few things Linux is doing in C that the Rust compiler would frown upon.
They're also similar in that if you tell them you use Linux but like Canonical and/or Lennart Poettering they'll yell at you and call you all sorts of names but if you tell them you're a Windows user they'll leave you alone
It really isn't. It is just a kernel
It's not just a kernel, it's a lifestyle.
For what it's worth, I recall some turd at r/graphic_design swearing at Inkscape because it was "communist"
Free Software is Leftism because it has got us great software and maybe the only bad thing I can say is that release schedules aren't a thing
Open Source is Capitalist Friendly because, ummmmm, extremely shitty Community Editions and putting everything cool in proprietary side, uhhhhh, random license changes to shit that isn't actually OSD compliant, unghhhhhh, need of constant vigilance against license violations.
Like I am happy cheap hardware vendors have adopted OSS components but why are they frequently so shitty about everything
