Because one of the candidates that stands a chance of winning is anti-genocide, right? Otherwise this wouldn't be agood-faith comparison, right?
You make it sound like Harris has a monopoly on genocide. Trump has made it quite clear he will increase the amount of genocide compared to the Biden s administration.
Harris made it quite clear she will support the Genocide just as hard as Trump.
Was she part of the administration that repealed the restrictions on Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory, or the one that reinstated them? Did Netanyahu name a settlement after her in Golan Heights as a way of thanking her for repealing the restrictions?
Did she say that Israel needs to finish the job and stop recording proof of bombings, or did she say she supports a ceasefire so the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom and self determination?
Yeah. Just as hard.
Okay, then if there's really only a choice between the two and they both support genocide just as much as the other, genocide doesn't really have any impact on whether you should vote for one or the other and maybe vote for the one who isn't racist, isn't a fascist, isn't an idiot, isn't going to die of a heart attack in office, and doesn't have a couchfucker as a VP.
Oh boy, another person thinking a lurch towards fascism will help get progressive policies get passed in congress. Or maybe they think fascists having control of the biggest intelligence services in the world will help the leftists thrive? Surely leftists will be just fine if the far right gets all the levers of power in government.
Its just the right wing hacks astroturfing as progressives pushing the "Dems love genocide" wedge into the progressive mindspace.
Genocide is the definition of peak Fascism
Im so glad I saved this earlier so I can pos it under every "bOtH sIdEs" meme I see and ruin the illusion just a little bit...
https://forward.com/fast-forward/649830/david-friedman-book-donald-trump-israel-wes-bank-annexation/
Whaaaat Trump is also in bed with israel? NO WAY!
You should look up who posted the article that you linked.
To what end do you point this out? Do you think it is irrelevant who wins the election and that the outcome of both candidate's administrations will be the same?
Jill Stein should win the election.
The pro-Trump crypto fascist bitch?
If I said what I think you should do, I'd be fucking banned.
“Fuck NATO and Ukraine”?
Thats not a better option…
You're right.
That said, that isn't a pragmatic goal. Jill Stein cannot win because of the USA's backwards election systems. Furthermore, it's imperative that Trump and the right do not win considering the effect it will have on social issues, civic rights and climate policy.
That said, Jill Stein would still be complicit with the imperialistic horrors of America, as I don't think her policies include removing every US base on foreign soil, completely disbanding every single US police department and emptying every prison while revoking the 13th Amendment and replacing it with one that actually bars slavery, and returning all stolen land back to the Natives it was taken from, nor do I think she is capable of doing those things with the US in its current state.
By supporting Jill Stein, you are also saying that systemic racism and genocide are not dealbreakers. You are inadvertently cherry picking which genocides you can stomach.
Only one president in US history definitely destroyed the chances at a two state solution in our lifetime by giving Jerusalem completely and totally to one side, and it wasn't Biden.
Ah yes the defining moment of Palestine, not the Gaza Genocide but the annexation of Jerusalem. Luckily Biden has stopped all israeli annexation of the West Bank and your argument isn't a dishonest deflection.
In past negotiations Israel was willing to return almost all of the settled land, and swap additional land to make up for around 98% percent of the 1967 borders, grant return to many Palestinians to come to Israel, as well as financially support those returning to the West Bank and Gaza, and agreed to halve Jerusalem. The negotiations still failed because the two sides couldn't agree on monuments in Jerusalem, like Al-Aqsa/The Temple Mount.
It's not a deflection, it's the single most important item of negotiation between the two sides, and Trump has done more long term damage by taking an official stance on that issue than any other president in US history has caused in the Israel/Palestine conflict.
Ouch! The truth stings
