Nestle is one of the most evil companies in existence. Why would you think they’d act any different? Stop buying their shit if you want to hurt them.
Yes.
But also push for policy that would enact laws to clip their wings, punish, and eventually either bankrupt or set them straight for real.
Their products are just crap in terms of quality, whether they are evil or not. Food from local producers is usually much better for the same price.
One of my favorite things about Nestlé is that five people can talk about how evil a company they are with examples and have it be five different things.
And they are all the most abhorrent things you could imagine.
Funny, I've seen this exact comment verbatim before.
Not only does Nestlé generally not care about humanity, they are also Swiss, so kinda built on
war profiteeringneutrality.Nestle is renowned for their ability to just not give a shit about anything except profit.
They've always been a scummy company
What app/website is this from?
The Zrada app
A company, in principle, cannot care about anything but profit maximization. Nestle isn't evil, it's merely more brazenly expressive of the amoral nature of capitalist production.
Not sure why you are being downvoted. It’s the invisible hand of capitalism that tends to cause evil.
If the current board of directors chose morality over profit, the shareholders would have an obligation to each other to oust the board and elect people who put profit first above all else.
If any one CEO tries to put morality over profit, that CEO will be replaced with someone who makes profit-focused decisions.
It’s all very impersonal as it is just a function of capitalism.
If governments weren’t all bought and paid for, maybe they could make it less profitable for the company to be evil, which would be the only way to make a change.
You cannot abstain from morality as if it's a choice YOU can make. Your actions on others make others assign your morality.
Institutions that claim to be amoral do so to justify their evil.
They break contracts and break the law on purpose, as a company they should be bound to the law or forfeit profit, but governments are weak.
Keep me honest, if they are operating in Russia, does that mean the US can block them from doing business in the US?
Or maybe them continuing business in Russia is worse for Russia than stopping it? (Dunno if this is sarcastic or not)
That the thing that I kinda have trouble understanding.
The big multinationals are expert at extracting profits out of national economies and putting it in tax havens.
If they boycott Russia and get replaced by Russian copies, wouldn't the Russian state get a larger share of profits ?
ukaine can fine this campanies mhile they are in russia, help them with money for defence and can dicourage doing business with russia
