New evidence found for Planet 9
New evidence found for Planet 9
phys.org
New evidence found for Planet 9
36 comments
-
-
A new planet in a distant orbit, you say?
In before the signal is older than the universe itself.-
Invite me to the jam, I swear I can whistle well
-
Back in my day it was called Planet X, god dammit!
-
By all rights it should be planet 10. Pluto got shafted.
-
If Pluto (and others like it) were a planet, then it would be Planet 238 or something.
-
Unfortunately, Pluto was a victim of how hard it is/was for us to detect planets and other objects at that distance. It was the first one we saw for a while, but once we got a clearer picture, there was no way we could keep calling it a planet.
-
Nah, it's easy.
Pluto is a planet.
See? Not that hard.
Edit: My bad, I thought I was in !science_memes@mander.xyz
-
-
-
Just call it Rupert already!
-
George
-
-
I find it amusing that we can prove the existence of black holes thousands of light years away and glean the state of the universe at its earliest moments, but we can't decide whether there's a rock big enough to count as a planet floating around the inside rim of the Oort Cloud.
-
Science and history are fun because we keep adding new information and proving / disproving theories.
-
The team acknowledges that other forces could be at play that might explain the behavior that they simulated but suggest they are less likely.
Space Whales
36 comments
This same group has been pushing this theory for a decade with no direct evidence. Each paper is just confirmation bias in action.
Some amateur types have been pushing this for decades with zero evidence, but as the article says, a legit pair from Caltech finally found some circumstancial evidence it could be possible, and this expanded group is just throwing more on the pile. I think it's just one of those "Well...let's say it's possible, here's what we'd be looking at for evidence..." kind of deals.