Tarquinn2049 @ Tarquinn2049 @lemmy.world

帖子

1

评论

1,231

加入于

2 yr. ago

I think it hitting the table was after the operator thought they set it to idle so they could remove the headset. Like basically since the robot is "no longer mimicking their actions" they don't have to worry about where they are moving their hands anymore.

It could, if it was told to. It's likely there is an idle or autonomous mode the operater was supposed to set it to before taking off the headset. Instead it was left in "replicate every action the operator streams to you mode" until the stream abruptly cut off while the robot wasn't in a balance point. It's possible the robot normally has an amount of delay/wait time when the signal is lost before reverting to some failsafe state. But since the signal was cutoff while it was flailing it's arms above it's head, that's alot of weight moving significantly above it's center of gravity and suddenly stopping with no compensatory movement offset of any other part of it's body.

I don't see anything to suggest AI was used in the making of the game, but I also don't see anything that suggests it was going to be a good game. So it may not have taken much pressure to get them to fold.

If they would have focussed on making a good place first, and then corrupting it with commercialism, they could have at least boiled a few of us frogs. But you can't start with the commercialism foot forward and the quality foot behind and expect to make a place worth visiting.

Here's the thing, if there was drugs on the boat, killing them still isn't ok. But no, we don't even "know" if they are telling the truth about the drugs either. We have no idea why they want these people killed. We have to "trust" them... I don't.

My mom was disgnosed with fibromyalgia at a time when most doctors either hadn't heard of it, or dismissed it as not being a real thing still. She's had a pretty long road of it. Luckily she had a good doctor at the time, I couldn't imagine how much worse it would be if any of those other doctors had been hers at the time.

It already sucked enough when she was referred to specialists or had to go in for other tangentially related stuff where it was important for them to know she had fibro. Her doctor would catch flak from them for writing it down as her official diagnosis. So glad her doctor was able to handle that and persevere. As great as it probably feels to eventually be proven right, it certainly couldn't have felt great getting there.

When it comes to a point where this is who you are pointing to as being your most noteworthy opponent... who are you?

Alternately, a buggalo ranch, named the Wong place.

Hehe, yeah. In the oldendays there was newspaper as an option for drying glass streak-free. It was never the best choice luckily, but it used to be prevalent. A squeegee was the old better solution, and a microfiber cloth is the new better solution.

Hehe, I just meant the collecting and redistributing knowledge part. Though yes, it also doesn't qualify as knowledge, just a string of words that seems like it fits the occasion. Though.... not to sell myself short, but not super far off.

Hehe yeah, I know it's slowly losing functionality... but I think I'm gonna ride this horse until just before it goes over a cliff. I just really like the presentation I've dialed in. I tried all the other apps and can't get anything that feels like me.

When I first came here, I grabbed every app, and put a few hours into each, and it was no contest. Sync hands down had the best UI configuration for me. There were multiple sticking points on each other app that were just deal breakers.

I have tried them all again recently, and still didn't find anything else I liked.

I haven't looked into why sync doesn't get updates anymore, hoping it's not guaranteed permanent... afraid to look.

If you are catching spray, try to increase the follow distance between you and the vehicle ahead. Same deal for rocks in places where that is a concern. It can be hard to leave a big gap, for fear that someone will come into that gap, but you can't fix everyone, you can only fix you.

But, we also do have wipers for anything that happens during the current drive, not as good as not getting dirty in the first place, but better than staying dirty.

It was general advice for the situation, not specific to the image. There are many things that can cause it to be much more difficult to see when driving towards a low sun than it actually needs to be. It's not a great situation at it's best, but it shouldn't be fully debilitating.

I am an autistic 41 year old man that lives in my parents basement. I just collect information and re-distribute it where it is needed.

I am basically the pre-cursor to an LLM, an LLM made of meat.

If you've ever watched or read anything with that "wise old hermit" that people line up to ask their philosophical questions to. That was an oldendays autistic person of the same type as me. Can't function in society, but has no emotional thinking to cloud their logic. The thing is, no matter how logical the advice was, and how much it made sense in the moment, it may not have been applicable to normal people. Though I am of course aware of the nature and source of my clarity and try to keep it in mind when giving advice. Unlike the wise hermits of old.

Not to say I am always right, and not to say logic is always the correct solution. But it often is, and I often am.

Clean your windshield, inside and out, and polarized sunglasses, or sunglass clips for glasses. And make sure any level of astigmatism you may have is known and corrected for.

If after washing your windshield, it still scatters the incoming light too much, it is probably pitted. You may have to consider replacing it. It is part of maintaining a vehicle. It may suck to be surprised with an expense like that, but the surprise expense of an avoidable accident is much worse. And might not only be expensive.

While my algorithm feed is still pretty clean, I only use it to find new people to subscribe to if I'm not getting enough good videos to satisfy the time I want to spend. Otherwise I do the new videos on my subscriber feed first, and only go to the rest if I want to after.

But alternate options are fine too, just, youtube can still be made to work for you if you control it, rather than letting it feed you.

Ok, so it'd be like if a wikipedia page about jesus said he was "our lord and saviour" instead of saying "some people consider him to be their lord and saviour". A page for "Lord and saviour" as a phrase might still list jesus as one possible link.

Basically taking a first person position on it, instead of a third person position. Like grokipedia is writing from first person perspective that Hitler is the fuhrer, which when you consider that it is a significant departure from the wikipedia article, as only 0.01% of the content of grokipedia is, suggests it's a hand crafted article written by someone that would refer to hitler personally as the leader, and not as someone some people used to call "the leader".

There is a reason it was edited immediately as soon as people noticed, due to how bad it looked once pointed out.

Alot of image software has started to include AI in it by default, it just "magically" makes all your images look "better" even if you don't tell it to. You have to specifically find out how to tell it to stop if you don't want it to provide that "service".

Can even happen with some phone cameras by default now.

Like play the original source video again, then look back at your still. Something changed it. I don't know what your process was in getting it from the movie to here, but some step along the way did this to it.

But, this looks nothing like the original. Something in your background workflow must have altered it.

The gradients are generally much more grainy and detailed, this is smoothed over like it's a tiktok video.

And all the black lines are thinner than they should be, like an ai upscaled it.

Whatever happened to your image, without your knowledge or consent, turned the classic animation of peter rabbit into a modern disney animation look.

Their faces are supposed to have a visible fur texture.

Something unknowingly provided you the "service" of cleaning up your image for you.

Because it seems unintentional, it doesn't feel right reporting it. I know that's the rule, but I can't bring myself to do it, you seem nice from having seen you around quite a bit here.