Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/485b0/485b02792df142a1913c61168684605abcc42554" alt="DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
Sam "wrong side of FOSS history" Altman must be pissing himself.
Direct Nitter Link:
https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/jiayi_pirate/status/1882839370505621655
You're viewing a single thread.
They finetuned 1.5-3b models. This is a non-story
109 0 ReplyThe headline is dumb, but the research isn't. According to the actual contents of the article, that $30 is still 27 times cheaper than what it costs OpenAI to make a similar sized model which also performs worse. That's still a big deal even if the people reporting on it made a stupid title for their article about it.
16 0 ReplyI feel like the author here doesnt know what the definition of "breakthrough" is.
15 0 ReplyYup and it's not even testing general reasoning. They didn't have money for that.
11 0 ReplyIs General reasoning in the room with us now?
28 0 ReplyIt's actually "Reasonings General", common misconception
15 0 ReplyI heard someone say Private Reasoning was around the corner. Think they’re related?
13 0 ReplyI hear Private Reasoning of the first through nth LLM Understander Corps is highly motivated
5 0 Reply
Is that the guy who sells insurance with Shaq?
7 0 ReplyThere's no way to know since they didn't have the money to test.
7 0 Reply
fuck almighty have these DeepSeek threads been attracting a lot of LLM “experts”
28 0 ReplyLLM experts aka poop sommeliers
23 0 ReplyMrPoopyButthole
Fucking hell what the hell is with the usernames do they want to be made fun of?
11 0 ReplyIt’s a Rick and Morty 🤮 character
11 0 Replylol that's worse! 👍
9 0 Reply