Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
Sam "wrong side of FOSS history" Altman must be pissing himself.
Direct Nitter Link:
https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/jiayi_pirate/status/1882839370505621655
You're viewing a single thread.
They finetuned 1.5-3b models. This is a non-story
The headline is dumb, but the research isn't. According to the actual contents of the article, that $30 is still 27 times cheaper than what it costs OpenAI to make a similar sized model which also performs worse. That's still a big deal even if the people reporting on it made a stupid title for their article about it.
I feel like the author here doesnt know what the definition of "breakthrough" is.
Yup and it's not even testing general reasoning. They didn't have money for that.
fuck almighty have these DeepSeek threads been attracting a lot of LLM “experts”
LLM experts aka poop sommeliers
MrPoopyButthole
Fucking hell what the hell is with the usernames do they want to be made fun of?
It’s a Rick and Morty 🤮 character
lol that's worse! 👍
Is General reasoning in the room with us now?
There's no way to know since they didn't have the money to test.
It's actually "Reasonings General", common misconception
Is that the guy who sells insurance with Shaq?
I heard someone say Private Reasoning was around the corner. Think they’re related?
I hear Private Reasoning of the first through nth LLM Understander Corps is highly motivated