For reals. This is the browser equivalent of being concerned that your car only has 14-way adjustable seats instead of 16, or whatever the marketing team dreamed up last year.
Could you be more specific? I've been using ff regularly for a long time now and never feel like the UI is getting in the way, though I do use a tab groups add-on to help manage my mess of open tabs. But I also haven't used Chrome for even longer than I've been using ff, so I'm curious about what specific ways you think the chrome ui is better.
In my UI (on desktop), tabs take up the title bar and all the other necessary buttons fit in the row with the address field. I've also got a bookmarks bar below that but it's optional. There's also the optional sidebar that I do use but mostly keep hidden.
For menus, there's the tab menu that is a button on the tab row and is mostly filled with open tabs plus 4 other items. Then there's the main menu with 19 items. Tbf, one is undesired (log in for sync) and at least 7 are redundant (as in if they weren't there, I'd still have easy access to their functionality), but I find menus are easier to discover features through (and hate how MS wants to get rid of them) and am ok with the redundancy.
There's also various context menus, but I've never found them to be obtrusive.
This is the state after some customization, but not a crazy amount. If I install FF on a new system, I can usually get it to a point where I'm happy with it pretty quickly.
If you mean the mobile version, I can understand that a bit more but personally prefer the screen space to be used up to expose more functionality. On mobile, I've felt like FF gives me the most power that feels closest to what I can do on a desktop, though tbf it's been a while since I used other browsers (excluding electron stuff or apps that integrate Chrome or Google Web view for web browsing rather than letting me use my preferred browser, though I've never felt happy with the more minimalist UI instead of the capabilities FF exposes).
I also haven't tried librewolf and don't know if the same UI is possible there.
I actually like the UI of the mobile version. I am also used to Firefox at this point but when I first moved it was painful. I think they should polish up the UI and focus on minimalism I stead of cramming in new features
Tab groups. I switched from Chrome to Firefox when all this Manifest V3 stuff started, and I'm still looking for a Firefox extension that works as well and looks as clean as the way Chrome handles tab grouping.
so many webapps and logins dont work properly in ff. or lets call it AdFox for now while they're still selling us out to alphabet. so autism is when you just see black or white. chrome isnt bad overall...they have a UX, AdFox isnt good overall for too many reasons.
i hope we'll get a real browser before the web is dead.
Right? What kind of wildly niche activities are people doing where FF doesn't work? All of my stuff works, and I've never had any weirdness. I browse art, shop online, do social media (a little), check my email, use auction sites, and watch Plex and other streaming services.
There must be an entire corner of the internet I don't even know about.
I have some telehealth services I need to use occasionally that don't support Firefox, but that's pretty much it. And I guess Google meet is glitchy, but that I can deal with.
I've been using Firefox consistently since the beginning in 2004. And Netscape navigator before that. And I have never had these issues you speak of. I never made the switch to chrome when it was released because I always hated the look of it. Firefox does everything anyone needs to do. I don't understand how some people struggle so much.
Vivaldi is so pretty, I hide pretty much everything from the interface and use it for making product demo and training videos. I considered using it as a daily but I've got FF set up just the way I like it.
I draw the line at installing edge on my linux machine! I just figure that if chrome works then edge works and haven't had anyone report any issues.