Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ZA
Posts
9
Comments
1,460
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yeah, could work, but requires the right people to pull it off. The latest book "Sunrise on the Reaping" had some bits about the rebellion that were going on in the capitol during Haymitch's Hunger Games. I'm sure they'll turn that book into a film and I hope they don't mess up those parts.

  • The pilot should be able to intervene. If the system interprets pilot input as nonsensical it overrides the pilot, but the pilot can switch to what Airbus calls "direct law" which directly maps pilot input to control surfaces without any sanity checks from the flight control system.

  • The maths and physics are the same, the impact is not. It's about energy and how well you can shield against it. Shielding against visible light is simple, thin cardboard is probably enough, the aluminium frame of an aircraft is more than sufficient and the plastic or ceramic packaging of a microcontroller too. Shielding against gamma radiation is hard, you'll need something like a thick layer of lead, and even then every once in a while a photon might get through.

    Edit: The incident that caused this grounding was a solar flare, so not just some visible light.

  • There's other radiation in solar radiation than just light. The most harmful stuff doesn't really reach the earth's surface, but you're exposed to higher radiation amounts when flying, same applies to any electronics on board an aircraft. That's why you will usually find multiple flight control computers that have to agree on their calculations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight-time_equivalent_dose

  • First of all there's probably no space for sidewalks this wide on both sides plus a street unless you want to demolish a lot of houses. And second do you really think it wouldn't be constantly used as parking and therefore never be usable as a sidewalk?

  • Maybe if they didn’t wreck where they lived

    how about some manufacturing or tech industry?

    So they should wreck their cities and nature, but by your own logic that would only fuel more tourism in areas that aren't wrecked.

  • Was heißt hier reales Beispiel, was für ein Szenario ist das? Selbst mit dem Auto wären das ja noch 6h, du willst vermutlich auch wieder zurück, oder hast du das da eingeplant? Und selbst auf 3h Auto fahren hätte ich zum täglichen Pendeln keine Lust. Abgesehen davon kann man auch unterschiedliche Transportmittel kombinieren, z.B. mit dem Fahrrad oder Auto (wenn es unbedingt sein muss) zu einem besser angebundenen Bahnhof fahren.

  • Technology @lemmy.world

    GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation

    Science Fiction @lemmy.world

    Hunger Games Sunrise on the Reaping

    Deutschland @feddit.org

    Bundestagspräsidentin Klöckner kritisiert Kirche als »NGO«

    ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich_iel

    Greentext @sh.itjust.works

    Anon is hungry

    Deutschland @feddit.de

    Länder wollen Deutschlandticket bis 2036 verlängern

    [Locked] YUROP @lemm.ee

    Good Morning, Bonjour, Buenos días, Buongiorno, Guten Morgen, Goedemorgen, Hyvää huomenta, Dzień dobry, Καλημέρα

    [Locked] YUROP @lemm.ee

    un titre intéressant