Some of those that work forces

Are the same that burn crosses

You are not the vast majority of people. People want killer economy, no unemployment, no inflation (I know these are all incompatible). They don't want meh.

I don't agree with the can example. Those are physically smaller and lack meaningful slack fill.

Your points stand for the first purchase. After that people will know the proportion of chip to air, and be annoyed by it. If they could do a bag smaller with minimal chip breakage and less air they would both succeed at getting more bags out per pallet and be lauded for not cheating people by selling air.

The slack fill is functional, and I don't see much incentive to over do it.

The second you say not great, but not bad, it's over.

The threshold is wanting great, so much the maga asshole made it his slogan. Nobody (collectively) wants "okay"

And the DOJ is announcing criminal charges against individuals implicated in such decisions and abuses, right???

/S

What is the company's incentive to make the package bigger than it needs to be?

Shipping costs come two fold... Weight and number of pallets. Weight change is negligible here, but the amount of air they need to ship will increase. They are incentivized to reduce it to a minimum to save on shelf, storage, and distribution costs.

I'm also wondering what the ROI is on automation costs and maintenance thereafter versus paying a conductor to just drive the thing.

In Copenhagen, the metro is fully automated and there are discussions of doing the same with the commuter rail (all grade separated). I think the more interesting benefit to the commuter rail is they will run closer together in time and run more frequently at night (every 10 vs 20 or 30 minutes)... But I don't think the financials would ever really pay for the upgrades needed...

But in the morning? He's making waffles.

Racism or the food?

Store might refuse large bills on small purchases. Doubt they'd put up a fit if you used a $100 to buy $120 worth of stuff.

What's stopping from vetoing any bill and making it say what you want?

Absolutely no carts in open aisles while-galloping

Abortion is legal

(Fucked up a few letters but point remains)

Makes his transmission moen

I really enjoyed sitting out on Suomenlinna drinking long drink while chilling on the rocks.

Utter contentment and peace.

Kineseo Tape

Let's say you can get the 2/3 of Congress. Are you really going to get 3/4 of the states legislatures?

But there aren't 150 catholic churches in Las vegas

Except we keep electing dick heads who literally don't want to take his money.

But there are checks against their rulings.

Most of their decisions are around laws that can be rewritten to correct whatever negative outcome was seen in the court. This meets your simple majority and presidential signature standard.

For claims of constitutionality there is still a check via amending the constitution... Which is not far from your proposal of 2/3 of Congress. You just also have to clear 3/4 of the states.

I think the problem is the idiots that are supposed to be the check are fully supporting what the courts are doing--and the idiots don't actually represent the interests or will of the people.

According to Wikipedia this is somehow acceptable and common. It needs to be detectible to the human eye that contact is lost.

Which seems like such a horseshit rule.

I didn't read the CNN piece as being overly critical. I read it as saying more like "hey she's not all that bad. She's actually pretty clever, but lack of trial experience is just bogging down process. She's learning and doesn't have anyone to mentor her in her lonely courthouse"

I left reading it a bit pissed off that such a fluff piece was even published.