Skip Navigation
Welp that answers a lot of why all .ml are down
  • I can answer this. The organization that says mali owns .ml gives the ownership country a lot of sway.

    So if the country of mali were to reach out formally to the organization and say "hey this domain violates our laws" they would take that very seriously and then work with the registrar & authoritative nameserver owner to handle the situation.

    I'm sure this isn't 100% accurate but 90-95 based on my work in a web hosting company

  • I feel like Fediverse users are nicer to each other and more generous with upvotes than reddit.
  • I like sounds of the content from .ml but I safe quite a few of the users share a really toxic mindset.

    It's irksome because they are supposed to be leftists and promoting how good communism or socialism can be which seems really at odds with how they speak and act.

  • Are there Christian movies other than Prince of Egypt that are considered good?
  • I appreciate you, I actually didn't know that set of books could be referred to as the Tanakh. I knew calling it the Torah would be a bit of an overstep.

    Even if Christians claim it as part of their religion and have been appropriating it for "2000 years", it's still neither right nor accurate. I view it as further attempts to make Christianity seem more like the right choice and ease conversion for Jews which really really REALLY bothers me. It's right up there with calling Jews white. We're not.

  • None of you will convince me that this wasn't foreshadowing
  • You're right and wrong.

    VW has money, but they have established themselves in the market. They sell cars and don't have all that much reason to switch over to EVs because they are a relatively successful company.

    Telsa is a new comer on the block, with any new business your first challenge is determining what you'll be focusing your business on. What exactly will be your advantage over your competition.

    Telsa decided to focus on EVs which were few and far between. To do this, they produced a large number of vehicles (almost definitely at a loss) combined that with a solid marketing strategy and would later reap the profits. To afford that strategy takes money and is not a position an established company will take only a new company.

    Having worked in a startup I can guarantee you, that was the original owners thought and do it well enough they either break even and go for the IPO or get bought out. I would suggest working in a startup but startups suck and will rove years off your life from stress so maybe don't go work for one.

  • None of you will convince me that this wasn't foreshadowing
  • It kinda annoys me to see people say "Elon revolutionized electric cars and space travel"

    No. No he didn't.

    Tesla took full advantage of economies of scale. If you mass produce an item, you can sell it for cheaper and still make a profit. Elon did not create Tesla, he bought it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tesla,_Inc. So it's fair to argue that Tesla's idea was likely not Elon's idea. He just bankrolled it

    SpaceX created a reusable rocket. However that's not the first time they were created, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reusable_launch_vehicle#:~:text=In the 1960s and 1970s,were reduced to prototype testing. So spaceX took an idea that had been proven as a proof of concept, productized it and... Took advantage of economies of scale, again.

    Elon isn't a genius. He just has enough money and the right people who manage him to successfully pull off other people's ideas and take advantage of economies of scale.

    Ps: to be faiiiiiir

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TO
    toasteecup @lemmynsfw.com
    Posts 0
    Comments 25