![User banner](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e77213fc-062e-401f-ad7a-da057fa2c028.png)
I don't think children should be able to decide to transition when they are at an age where their brain is not even close to developed. At a later age if they still feel the same way I don't disagree with it, but when they are children I don't think it should be an option for them.
For fuck’s sake, shut this down already.
Are you referring to the illegal crossings or the attempts to prevent illegal crossings?
He should call their bluff and force them to allow thousands of illegal crossings per day without doing anything about it? That's the right move, in your opinion?
Nobody cares about what a random court in California has to say on the Israel/Palestine conflict. But of course they have to have their say, because they think they are important.
Being a spy is dangerous.
Absolutely not, I believe helping a child transition is child abuse.
West Bank settlers aren't immigrating to the US or holding US assets, this is just a political move to appease low information voters.
Chinese malware is probably preferable to whatever the FBI did with their access, and you'll never find out exactly what it was.
still wants full control of what happens to her money
Yeah, people generally do lol.
They need to learn about the baton.
Lmao. It tells them to take effective measures immediately and report back. Which means they aren’t now taking effective measures to prevent their troops from committing genocide.
Again, this is not true. You have done the same thing as you did before regarding war crimes, the first part of what you say is true and the second part is your own opinion passed off as the truth. The court has heard allegations of genocide, and the preliminary response is to ask Israel to refrain from any genocidal acts or incitements.
That's your opinion. I would hazard a guess that more people support the execution of violent murderers than oppose it.
No, that's not true. They did not ask Israel to "stop committing war crimes" as that would imply they ruled that Israel is currently committing war crimes. The ruling instead asks Israel to refrain from any genocidal acts.
The claim is baseless and the court will rule as such, it doesn't matter how much "support" the claim has.
How did his victim feel when he murdered her? If this monster suffered for a few minutes, so be it.
It's a useful tool for law enforcement, but it should be used only against the most severely combative detainees.
Gaza is controlled by terrorists who launched an attack against Israel and Israel is responding to the attack. Civilians die in war, but the Israeli goal is very clearly not genocide.
No. Genocide isn't a term you can throw around lightly, something you don't like isn't genocide just because you think it is. There is no genocide in Palestine, and it's horrendously offensive to even suggest that such a thing is occurring.
A self-defense military operation against insane terrorists is not genocide in any way.
There is no "Palestinian genocide". It absolutely is not happening.
Source: https://twitter.com/MLS/status/1686916359198789632
You knew it was going to happen as soon as the referee whistled.