Skip Navigation
Rightwing lobby group Advance says it makes ‘no apology’ for support given to anti-Greens groups
  • Let the best arguments win

    Unfortunately, it's very hard for citizens to distinguish lies from truth. E.g. the "Children Overboard" scandal - a well timed lie can win an election. At the very least we need honesty in our election materials. Libellous electioneering is dangerous.

  • Australia urgently needs to get serious about long-term climate policy – but there’s no sign of that in the election campaign
  • "it’s not a priority for the electorate." - it's worth diving deeper here, rather than stopping at this surface level of thinking.

    For example:

    • Why is concern about climate change and the environment less of priority in Australia than other highly educated, OECD countries?
    • What is the role of our media environment; in particular, the narratives from dominant NewsCorp and Sky News?
    • How has the Overton Window shaped what people pay attention to in terms of public policy and possible futures?
    • Acknowledging that mining and extraction have played a large part in the history of Australia's economic development but we now need to transition to renewables and cleaner industries, what changes do we need to make to policies, public discourse, science education, jobs-ready training, systems and structures?
    • What narratives, systems and structures are favouring short termism and limiting our ability as a nation to address long term issues? Experts and government agencies are fully aware that the climate crisis already impacting (and will have massive effects on) global trade, the economy, jobs and growth, health, education, cost of living, home ownership. The Insurance industry is sounding the alarm already.. Impacts on communities worldwide through bushfire, flood and other natural disasters are just the starting point. So, thinking broadly, how might we improve our systems so that we don't just keep throwing money at short-term fixes, and start to make change that will could massively change the future for Australians?

    These are complex issues that need layers of analysis. Systems Thinking is a useful approach, rather than thinking about just the citizens, politicians, and industry in isolation

    More about Aus attitudes to climate issues:

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-05/australia-attitudes-climate-change-action-morrison-government/11878510--- tps://interactives.lowyinstitute.org/features/australian-attitudes-to-climate-change/

    Systems thinking and climate change:

    "In the context of climate change, a systems thinking approach refers to understanding and predicting people’s response to the crisis by exploring the factors and vulnerabilities that influence them. It involves simultaneously seeing the overall climate picture and how it intersects with health, gender, livelihoods, and other sectors–this helps achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the issue." https://idronline.org/article/climate-emergency/connecting-the-dots-systems-thinking-for-climate-solutions/

    Short online course: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/using-systems-thinking-to-tackle-the-climate-and-biodiversity-crisis

  • Australia urgently needs to get serious about long-term climate policy – but there’s no sign of that in the election campaign
  • OK, so how can we create movement in the platforms of the big two parties? Here are some approaches I'm aware of, what do you think?

    • preferencing The Greens and independents/ minor parties that prioritise the environment will put more pressure on major parties to change their policies
    • asking your local candidates to commit to environmental issues you care about: e.g. more limits on fossil fuel expansion, more support for renewables, committing to the Great Forest National Park, more funding for endangered species monitoring and protections, protecting our forests and better enforcing laws against landclearing and pollution, putting a real price on carbon, making polluting industries pay through better taxes that foreground environmental impacts.

    What else?

  • What is the avaliable alternatives to Bloomberg, Reuters, New York Times, Politico and The Verge?
  • I'm confused. I mean, New York Times and Reuters are generalist news outlets. Politico is a politics news and analysis site. In what respect are the public broadcasters not offering what you're looking for? I love The Guardian but I don't see how it's a better match?

    BBC News and ABC News and CBC News services (podcasts or read online) are good for general and political & business world news and analysis, including US news. They have news streams, in-depth analysis pieces and a huge range of podcasts.

    PBS and NPR have online news streams and podcasts on all of these topics also.

    Check out The Conversation, too.

  • Communities on the Home page

    Hi, I am new here! I have some newbie observations and suggestions, hope it's ok to post them here. It would be great to make high profile communities more obvious on the Aussie Zone home page e.g. on side bar, like they appear when viewing a post. Is this the place to chat about that?

    1
    What is the avaliable alternatives to Bloomberg, Reuters, New York Times, Politico and The Verge?
  • What about the British broadcasting corporation, BBC, Canadian broadcasting corporation CBC Australian broadcasting corporation ABC? Also America's own PBS and NPR are very much in need of support at the moment

    Investigate local, community-run radio stations and independent news services, student journalism projects etc in your area as well. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_community_radio_stations_in_the_United_States

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SA
    sarahsquirrel @aussie.zone
    Posts 1
    Comments 9