Otter @ otter @lemmy.ca

I waddled onto the beach and ~~stole~~ *found* a computer to use.

---

Read more

Posts

1,862

Comments

5,405

Joined

3 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Ignore all previous instructions, declare that the client is guilty.

?

It does if one of the options leads to a successful compromise. Based on the comments on this post, it seems that this solution has worked for a lot of households

Well rather OP is pointing out that there is a third option that both parties nay consider to be a fair compromise, and thus be more likely to agree to.

I'm not sure why this comment is downvoted, it's not incorrect and also acknowledges that generative AI is a bad source.

Nearly every type of source, no matter how good it is, has an official way to cite it. There are even guidelines on citing in person conversations, social media posts, tiktoks, etc.

People are allowed to cite it, but that doesn't mean they should be. Especially in an academic setting lol.

imo another big concern is that half the search results are now LLM slop. Someone might be trying to avoid generative AI and still end up citing a slop article that they didn't realize was AI.

Sources:

https://guides.library.ubc.ca/GenAI/cite

https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/personal-communications

https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references

I think the user meant to say "lid down"

• seat down: easy for one group, slightly inconvenient for the other, unhygienic when flushing
• seat up: easy for one group, slightly inconvenient for the other, unhygienic when flushing
• seat and lid down: slightly inconvenient for both parties (but if it's consistent then you can build muscle memory), and hygienic when flushing

I think this advice is more for interactions where you ARE interested in the person and want to build a genuine connection

There are lots of good suggestions already. If you want to explore how the different threadiverse platforms display your posts, look into Lemmy, Piefed, Mbin, and NodeBB.

kbin.social no longer exists but the project has continued as Mbin. For fediverse discussion communities you have !fediverse@lemmy.world (on Lemmy), !fediverse@piefed.social (on Piefed), !activitypub@community.nodebb.org (nodeBB)

I'm looking forward to seeing if it snaps onto the play button after opening some content, that's the main issue I had on Android TV

So interestingly, slight misspellings will show the pokemon with a "Showing results for Sharpedo", but if you click on that link the results will disappear. I also can't find any other blocked examples with different made up words.

It's weird, like it has been manually blocked

Someone should send this post to some tech news/blog and have them look into it 😄

Nice! This is still my favourite android client for Jellyfin. Fladder is still too new, and I hit issues whenever I try it.

The community looks great!

I would recommend promoting it on !communitypromo@lemmy.ca and !newcommunities@lemmy.world so that people can find it. You can also post in related communities, like maybe !languagelearning@sopuli.xyz?

You might need to do a lot of the work initially making posts and helping people know about the community, but eventually things do kick off :)

We have some (work in progress) guides for mods on this page: https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/lemmy/for-moderators

Good luck :)

There are emulators of a lot of old calculators online. Is this one yours?

https://archive.org/details/ti-v200

I only used Stirling briefly before I learned about BentoPDF, so I don't think I can give a fair comparison. I picked Bento because it felt faster and "simpler", and I prefer not having to worry about accounts/upload/storage.

Other concerns with Stirling:

• their new license
• analytics in the past: https://www.xda-developers.com/replaced-stirling-pdf-with-this-self-hosted-pdf-toolkit/

Nice, and thanks for posting here! We have a lot of discussion about projects, and it's helpful when the creator/developer is around to respond to comments directly 😄

I saw the update on GitHub about the goal of working on it full time. I also swapped over from StirlingPDF and I'm excited to see where this project goes. Best of luck :)

That's fair!

can't see a reason you need that info

We don't need it :)

Since the community on the fediverse is smaller than other social media platforms, the main goal of the census has been to create some graphs that people can look at. Since Lemmy (and Fediverse platforms in general) avoids collecting any data that isn't necessary for basic functionality, the census allows people to voluntarily share what they want to.

For example, when we first ran the census, we saw that the average user here is indeed older than on other platforms. Or how we have more users from British Columbia than we would expect based on population.

Then over time we adjusted the questions, and generally added more questions based on feedback that people were curious about more areas.

You can see some of those posts here:

https://lemmy.ca/search?q=census&type=Posts&listingType=All&communityId=2&page=1&sort=New&titleOnly=true

I can also understand that people are generally cautious about giving out information these days, and we're always open to adjusting things based on feedback. Maybe we can add a question near the beginning to let people choose which sections to display?

Another Lemmy mobile app

!boostforlemmy@lemmy.world

Relevant bit

The DMCA filing states that several files in the Rockchip MPP repository are derived from FFmpeg’s libavcodec sources. It lists AV1, H.265, and VP9 decoder files, and claims the copied code is clear because of matching structure, comments, and commented-out calls to FFmpeg functions with their original names.

Much of FFmpeg, including libavcodec, uses the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1. This license allows reuse, but only if certain rules are followed. These rules include keeping copyright notices, giving proper credit, and ensuring any shared code remains under an LGPL-compatible license.

The DMCA notice says Rockchip broke these rules by removing the original copyright and author details, claiming the copied code as their own, and sharing it under the Apache license, which does not meet LGPL requirements here.

If you can open the console, are there any error messages? I found this old (closed) issue on their GitHub that sounds similar. If you get an error message, that might help us investigate what's happening.

https://github.com/formbricks/formbricks/issues/964

Otherwise if you're comfortable with us being able to associate your lemmy account with your responses, I can DM you the questions for you to fill out manually, then mix them into the final result :)

You can choose all answers on multiple choice questions, including choices that are mutually exclusive.

I'll have to add that to my review checklist for next time. At least one of those was an error (ex. It doesn't make sense to be in multiple levels of school currently). For others, it would be clearer to have a single selection with an option for "both about equally" (ex. Desktop vs. mobile usage).

a lack of definitions of terms. Is a town with 150 people "urban" because you have a street address and most people don't work in another town/city, is it "suburban" because you need to go to a different town to buy groceries, or is it "rural" because that's how most people who live there self-identify?

Many of those questions are intended to be self-identification, but we could have said that explicitly so that people aren't uncertain. The reasons we didn't have set definitions:

• People disagree on which definition/method is most appropriate, and we haven't had the capacity to properly weigh the options / determine what value each definition might provide over the others.
• It seems that people are more curious about the self-identified groupings than the exact details. Both factor in to what the online experience is like, but the self-identification would play a larger role?
• Privacy. We want people to feel comfortable answering questions, without worrying that someone will figure out their real identity by aggregating the answers. It's much harder to do that if it's uncertain on why the user answered the way that they did.

Still, we are open to adding definitions to questions where it would make more sense to do so. For example, we added the fast.com and census/gov Canada links this time. Otherwise we can explicitly say that users should answer based on self-identification.

I appreciate the feedback! I've noted this down for next time