Yes, there it obviously means "no parking". You were complaing about the little bits between the parking spots. Right?
I don't see the problem. Don't park outside the marked area. Red line is reminding you, because lots of people think the marked rectangle is a suggestion.
Ja, jeg synes at stå uden for fællesskabet kan være et større problem, end at bruge de apps fællesskabet bruger. Jeg aner ikke hvordan det foregår i dit tilfælde, men her valgte jeg at give mig.
Jeg er enig i at en anbefaling er ligegyldig. Næsten alle de her apps må ikke bruges af børn under 13 alligevel.
forældre kan jo allerede begrænse adgang til forskellige sociale medier
Der er MANGE forældre (inkl mig) som gerne vil begrænse børnenes brug af visse sociale medier, men ikke gør det fordi det er der deres venner er.
I mine børn startede i de yngre klasser, var der bred enighed blandt forældrene at det var liiige tidligt nok. Men vi opnåede ikke enighed om at begrænse det, og det endte med at flertallet søvar forældre der stod alene.
Derfor er der er stigende antal forældre som efterspørger regulering på et højere niveau.
I like to call it "debt", because it's a problem that grows while you ignore it. Worst case, it becomes easier to start over than fixing it. But getting 100% rid of it isn't good business either.
Like all other analogies, don't overthink it. I don't now what "involuntary liquidation" would mean for tech debt. Unless you mean the product won't run for a significant amount of time due to overwhelming tech debt, which can absolutely happen.
This is such an odd post. So many details that are highly debatable, not many important details.
For example, is the egg refrigerated or room temperature? That changes the timing a lot. Talking about accurate timing is pointless without at least some idea of the initial temperature.
I don't use a ice bath, or any kind of cooling down for hardboiled eggs. I don't really have a problem peeling them, unless they are very fresh.
Lithium-* batteries don't actually have any specific useful numbers. It's something like this (the actual numbers are pulled out of my ass and depends on battery time and test parameters and even then I'm simplifying):
At 0 volts, the battery is dead.
At 1 volts, the battery is practically dead.
Discharging to 2 volts kills it after around 100 times.
Discharging to 3 volts kills it after around 10 000 times
Discharging to 3.5 volts kills it after 100 000 times
Charging to 4 volts kills it after 100 000 times
Charging to 4.2 volts kills it after 10 000 times
Charging to 4.3 volt kills it after 1000 times
Charging to 4.4 volts kills it after 100 times
Charging to 4.5 has s significant chance of it catching fire
Now choose how many charge cycles you want it to survive, and you know which voltage to consider 0% and which to consider 100%. The bigger difference, the bigger capacity with the same battery.
This is why a phone with 0% battery can tell you that it's out of battery.
You can also adjust what "killed" means. Is it when battery capacity is reduced to 80%? 50%?
I have to repeat - the numbers are not accurate, and this is strongly simplified.
It's just an illustration of what 0% and 100% means it's just where you are on the useful range, according to the manufacturers definition of useful.
Det er altså lidt interessant at læse om er nyt projekt i nyhederne, sidde på kontoret og blive enige om at der ender galt og hvordan det ender galt, og så måneder eller år senere læse at vi havde ret.
Hvis vi kan se det, bare ud fra hvad der bliver givet til medierne, så er der helt klart interne medarbejdere der kan se det. Og ledere der har taget beslutningen, som burde kunne se det.
Det sker for tit til at det kan forklares med at ledelsen ikke lytter til medarbejderne.
Jeg har selv set "fejlende" projekter, hvor ledelsen tydeligvis havde en anden agenda end de påstod.
Yeah, that seems like a much bigger problem.