magnusrufus @ magnusrufus @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

323

Joined

2 yr. ago

No you didn't. That doesn't make your supposed point that the people that did the torture directly deserve more time in jail than him. You took a weird stand at a weird time and communicated it very poorly the whole way through.

The start of the conversation seems to be someone saying that what he did was fucked up and he deserves more than 5 years for it. Then you wanted to make a distinction about his role in the torture for entertainment industry. If your point was that the people committing the torture directly should receive longer sentences than him then you did just about the worst job possible to convey that.

No one is saying that's not true. You are not making a point there. Connecting the people willing to do it to the people willing to view it increases demand and increases the occurrence.

Making doing a bad thing easier makes the bad thing happen more. This is a really simple concept.

This type of comment always really bothers me. You are misrepresenting what is being compared. It's not running chatrooms that is being judged. It's facilitating and organizing the creation and distribution of animal torture content. If he was running chatrooms about my little pony no one would care. Framing it as running chat rooms is dishonest. Flying planes isn't bad. Flying planes into buildings is. Say out loud the part you are trying to to minimize.

You just made that up.

Serious question if you know you don't engage with discord deeply why do you think anyone here should care about your pointless question?

Neat. A news source and a user I can safely forever ignore.

I'm with you on my ambivalence regarding swift and I also couldn't help but notice the lack of thought occurring in OP's shower.

Very well said.

It sounds like there is a lot going on and most of it sounds very concerning.

Codependence is bad. Hinting that he will die without you is bad. It's either seeking pity, attempting to control or manipulate you, or a genuine mental health issue. Tickling, biting and punishment are bad. If you are not enjoying and consenting to those things and he knows that then it's a form of abuse if he continues any of those things. Being possessive and jealous are bad.

It sounds like he's been engaging in a lot of tactics to control you.

You can love someone and it can still be best for both of you to not be together. If he is an incomplete non-functional person without you that is his issue. He needs to fix that. It is not fair and not your responsibility to try and fill in the rest of him to make him a whole person. If the things that make you happy, like concerts and the city, upset him so much that seems like a significant issue as well. You both need to be able to do things to fulfill your individual happiness in addition to your joint happiness. If you doing the things that make you happy makes him unhappy that is incompatible. If you give up the things that make you happy for his sake that's still incompatible. Being together shouldn't depend on one of you being unhappy.

It's impossible to give perfect or absolute advice over the Internet. However I suspect you should trust your conclusion that your lives are heading in different directions. I think it would be good to discuss the things you have mentioned here with your psychologist. They are presumably a competent professional and can go into greater detail with you. In the end though a relationship has to work for both of you. If you give up the city and concerts and devote yourself to staving off his depression or self harm then you will wither and eventually resent him.

I think you meant lop, not lob. At least I hope vets aren't yeeting pet testicles.

Ah so "privatization" in the sense that it's still government controlled but not at a national level and the type of state control they are aiming for is more akin to the abusive traditional privatization by corporations?

In this context what do you mean by state privatization?

That doesn't matter. The hypothetical presented by OP has already established the assumption that a robot can suffer.

Believe it or not someone can fully understand the plot of a movie and find it to not be worth watching. Especially when that movie is rocking an 18% on rotten tomatoes.

It sounds like you just didn’t understand the film.

Don't act that way.

I'll pile on the confirmation bias for sh.itjust.works being full of either awful or idiotic users. Not all of them and maybe not even most of them but enough of them that it's left a very noticable impression.

EdibleFriend isn't saying that people don't make that claim, they are saying that those people are being dishonest when making that claim. That they don't really believe what they are saying.

More accurately it's the republicans way of saying that.

I dunno. From ABCDE's comments and Demi's lyrics I was reading the conversation as being about the latter. I didn't really see anyone making the case that Wilmer wasn't being a creep.