It’s difficult to make real science based on anecdotal accounts. The best that can be done is some meta analysis, but that has its limits. There must be a systematic process to collect robust evidence (i.e experiments). Other scientists should be able to look at the same data and reach the same conclusions.
Well, systematically putting people at near death and bring them back for questioning isn’t exactly ethical.
At least this madness is isolated to this function. It can easily be fixed.
Pirate’s code is just cluttered with magic numbers everywhere. Hard coded numbers that are referring to a big ”story array”, or characters. It’s just a giant web of complexity. The only fix is to start from scratch.
I worked at Blizzard. I worked at Blizzard. I worked at Blizzard.
I haven’t seen it be used to defend shitty compromises. An orphan crushing machine can never be good, so it doesn’t really apply.
It’s more used in the context of creating something. May it be a novel, a drawing, a song or a game. Don’t get too stuck on trying to make every little detail perfect. It will burn you out eventually, and you won’t finish your project at all.
It’s mostly about time management.
It’s the art of the deal
This comic has a solid set-up, but the punchline is weak.
attacking a defenseless neighboring people
They’re so close to figuring it out
It’s ironic how these people can draw the wildest connections (cheese pizza is mentioned once in a leaked email -> pizzagate pedophile ring!!), but ignore the most obvious connections because it’s too inconvenient for them.
Guys, I’m starting to think that Epstein’s best friend might actually be in the Epstein files.
He loves Trump more than his daughter
Soundtrack is pretty good I guess?
Invalid opinion. Soundtrack is peak.
There’s a difference between ” it hasn’t changed because it doesn’t need to be changed” and ” it hasn’t changed because it’s impossible to predict the impact of any change, and no one wants to be responsible for things breaking”.
What a snowflake
He’s also doing a lot of argument by definition.
For example, he argued that God exists because morals exist. This follows from his own definition, which states that morals can only come from God.
Unrealistic. This is way too coherent. Needs more word salad.
There was a German mathematician who allegedly managed to do it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Kaluza
Strange stories were told of his private life, for example, that he taught himself to swim during his thirties by reading a book about it and succeeded at his first attempt in the water.
That’s probably what’s going to happen.
”See? The weather service didn’t alert in time. What a waste of money.”