Didn't something similar happen in Turkey with Erdogan a few years back? Pretty sure he was accused of being behind it himself too; don't know what the final verdict was though.

I think it's a pretty common accusation, just like when a politician is attacked, someone will invariably suggest that they staged it in order to get more support.

I read every single word of it, twice, and I was laughing all the way through. I'm sorry you don't like it, but it seems strange that you immediately assume that I haven't read it just because I don't agree with you.

De skriver, at den er startet i taget. Håndværkere igen?

This is such a fun and insightful piece. Unfortunately, the people who really need to read it never will.

Jeg spiser ikke engang den slags ramen, så forbuddet rammer mig "kun" principielt, men det er simpelthen det vildeste klovneshow, det her.

Af rapporten fra DTU fremgår det også, at der ikke er foretaget egentlige målinger af nudlernes indhold af den kemiske forbindelse capsaicin, som er i chili.

I stedet har de eksperter, der har lavet rapporten for styrelsen, regnet sig frem til indholdet ved at læse beskrivelser af produkterne på en hjemmeside, hvor de blev solgt.

På hjemmesiden asiatorvet.dk har der blandt andet stået: "OBS: denne nærdødbringende version har mere end 13.000 fucking Scoville". Scoville er en enhed, man kan beregne capsaicinindholdet ud fra.

Ud fra den beskrivelse har eksperterne beregnet, hvor højt indholdet af capsaicin er i nudlerne.

Eksperterne noterer sig desuden i rapporten, at der på hjemmesiden er billeder af tre "drenge/unge mænd".

- Ud fra ansigtsudtryk og kropssprog ser det ud til, at to af drengene har ondt i maven eller brændende fornemmelse i mundhulen efter at have spist af nudlerne, står der i rapporten.

Kan man ikke få lov til at læse den rapport? Det lyder som om, det kunne være en god intro til hvordan man ignorerer den videnskabelige metode, datagrundlag og fakta generelt, og bare skriver hvad man nu lige føler for i dag. Det lyder i hvert fald ikke som et grundlag, hvorpå fødevarestyrelsen bør agere — og da slet ikke med vendinger som "risiko for akutte forgiftninger" og lignende.

Hvad er det for en "forbruger", der har henvendt sig og hvem er den i familie/venner med fra fødevarestyrelsen?

De må hellere tilbagekalde nisseøl pga. risiko for akut alkoholforgiftning. Fucking klaphatte...

Edit: Jeg antager, at det her er billedet, de henviser til i rapporten: https://web.archive.org/web/20231003202700/https://asiatorvet.dk/shop/53-samyang/ Et promo-shot for produktet, der sælger sig selv på at være stærkt.

Edit 2: Rapporten er her: https://janax.dk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Nudler-med-chili-6.-juni-2024.pdf Den er ikke helt så dum, som først antaget, men det er sgu stadig en usaglig affære.

I get notifications for calls (obviously), SMS messages (of which I receive an average of 1 per month) and IMs from my immediate family. Everything else I check up on when I actually feel like I have the time for it. This has dramatically reduced the number of emails and other things I forget to reply to/act on, because I see them when I want to and when I have the time to actually deal with them; not when some random notification pops up when I'm doing something else, gets half-noticed and swiped away because I'll deal with it later.

Cloud Saves may be difficult to deal with, depending on what games you play.

The headline is supposedly CISA urging users to either update or delete Chrome — it's not Chrome/Google itself. However, I'm having trouble finding the actual CISA alert. It's not linked in the article as far as I can tell.

Fair enough, and thanks for the offer. I found a demo on YouTube. It does indeed look a lot more reasonable than having an LLM actually write the code.

I'm one of the people that don't use IntelliSense, so it's probably not for me, but I can definitely see why people find that particular implementation useful. Thanks for catching and correcting my misunderstanding. :)

I'm closing in on 30 years too, started just around '95, and I have yet to see an LLM spit out anything useful that I would actually feel comfortable committing to a project. Usually you end up having to spend as much time—if not more—double-checking and correcting the LLM's output as you would writing the code yourself. (Full disclosure: I haven't tried Copilot, so it's possible that it's different from Bard/Gemini, ChatGPT and what-have-you, but I'd be surprised if it was that different.)

Here's a good example of how an LLM doesn't really understand code in context and thus finds a "bug" that's literally mitigated in the line before the one where it spots the potential bug: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2024/01/02/the-i-in-llm-stands-for-intelligence/ (see "Exhibit B", which links to: https://hackerone.com/reports/2298307, which is the actual HackerOne report).

LLMs don't understand code. It's literally your "helpful", non-programmer friend—on stereoids—cobbling together bits and pieces from searches on SO, Reddit, DevShed, etc. and hoping the answer will make you impressed with him. Reading the study from TFA (https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3613904.3642596, §§5.1-5.2 in particular) only cements this position further for me.

And that's not even touching upon the other issues (like copyright, licensing, etc.) with LLM-generated code that led to NetBSD simply forbidding it in their commit guidelines: https://mastodon.sdf.org/@netbsd/112446618914747900

Edit: Spelling

I wouldn't trust an LLM to produce any kind of programming answer. If you're skilled enough to know it's wrong, then you should do it yourself, if you're not, then you shouldn't be using it.

I've seen plenty of examples of specific, clear, simple prompts that an LLM absolutely butchered by using libraries, functions, classes, and APIs that don't exist. Likewise with code analysis where it invented bugs that literally did not exist in the actual code.

LLMs don't have a holistic understanding of anything—they're your non-programming, but over-confident, friend that's trying to convey the results of a Google search on low-level memory management in C++.

Nowhere does he say that he doesn't believe in Wunterslash, so I'm cool with him.

I don't think anyone should fear for their lives because of their opinions regardless of how stupid they are.

Edit: It's pretty fucked up that this is somehow controversial...

Ja, de leverer konsekvent kvalitet, det er meget imponerende. Normalt er jeg også tilbageholdende mht. early access, men jeg var klar det sekund Hades 2 ramte EA.

Der er masser at glæde sig til, især hvis man er lidt pjattet med græsk mytologi — vi møder endelig en masse af de personer/guder/skikkelser, der ikke var med i 1'eren.

Hades 2 (early access). Det er early access, men langt mere omfattende end mange "færdige" spil. Der er mere fokus på magi (man spiller trods alt som heks) og lidt mindre på direkte kamp som i 1'eren, men det er fedt — og historien er selvfølgelig fed som altid (græsk mytologi).

Tror ikke, det sal forstås på den måde. Jeg forstod det mere som: Han har begået nogle forskellige lovovertrædelser, vi skal lige finde ud af hvilke af dem, vi vil sigte ham for.

Altså, f.eks., hvis du stjæler en cykel og dumper den midt på en cykelsti, så kan du både sigtes for henkastning af affald og cykeltyveri (og sikkert mere), men det er ikke sikkert, at de vil sigte dig for begge dele, men sigte dig vil de nok helt sikkert.

That's great. Don't get why they're not announcing it, but whatever, I'm glad it's gone.

Det kræver bare, at det bliver prioriteret højt nok og at der afsættes resurser nok til det — så kan det meste lade sig gøre. Men hvis vi skal være lidt realistiske, så kan bare et skift fra Office 2016 til 365 (inkl. skift til hybrid Azure AD og on-prem AD, fordi 365 angiveligt kræver det, samt andre afhængigheder) være en gigantisk omvæltning for en arbejdsplads og kræve bogstaveligt talt års forberedelse afhængigt af størrelse og antal/type af afhængigheder, så jeg ville forvente, at et skift til en helt anden platform/OS/økosystem vil være proportionalt sværere. Men ja, hvis man poster nok penge og energi i det, så kunne man godt gøre det; penge er bare ikke ligefrem det, der er mest af i det offentlige.

De prøvede det tilbage i 2003 i München med blandede resultater (se https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_adopters), muligvis også besværliggjort af lobbyisme fra MS. Forhåbentlig går det bedre denne gang.