lambalicious @ lambalicious @lemmy.sdf.org

**I write English / Escribo en Español.**

---

Read more

Posts

22

Comments

1,142

Joined

2 yr. ago

Hmmm estoy en modo envidia si es así, honestamente.

¿Está bien el hamster? Aún no he visto aparecer el hilo de la próxima (esta) semana.

Not really conductive as long as most funds are siphoned by the C-suite ranks. Get rid of the C-fat first, maybe even turn Mozilla into a co-op, then have the People fund it.

No thanks. This is a dark pattern towards centralization. Just go back to reddit.

Exactly! And that's why the choice in the UI is important. My understanding is previous versions of PF at least let your viewers know you offer salads. There's no (good) reason why the very minimum useful version of that can't be maintained. Comaps and OSMand for example are map applications, but they let me know when a given location has an associated Wikipedia article for example. They don't even need to implement something like a Wikipedia Viewer itself; just offer the links. Links are cheap, and are the foundation and backbone of both the internet and of any useful concept of a "fediverse".

so, an old style BBS?

I'd be all in.

Because PixelFed is purposefully hiding the salad option from them. Which is what we are complaining about: it's lying to our potential customers about us. Note that it didn't do that before.

This is great yes and IMO how it should be done. It's not necessary fr eg.: PixelFed to implement themself all the functionality to process forums, videos, cooking recipes, Pokémon boxes, microblogging, macroblogging, nanoblogging, femtoblogging, nanopicturing, macroboosting, etc. Just one: linking (and, well, properly announcing the link is there).

No, you as a poster in the Fediverse are selling pizzas and salads. PixelFed is "misrepresenting" you, for lack of a better word, by telling people you only sell pizzas. The thing is, it wasn't doing that before. It was purposefully made to hide useful information that was there before. IMO there should be a sticky "this user has other content which is not images" headbar or something. Only removable as an opt-in per account followed, so that it is not possible for people to say that PF purposefully hid information.

Me ayuda a inspirarme, sí.

inb4 hago mi cuenta en el friendica de chilemasto antes de eso

The problem is not "you ordered a pizza yet are complaining it isn't a salad". The problem is you are selling pizzas and salads, but the middleman is undercutting you on the delivery of the pizzas, leaving your clients with the fake impression you sell only salads and/or provide a bad service.

All that said, from an interface design perspective the current mode is exactly how it should happen. Pixelfed and pretty much everything else are purposefully subset-specific apps. All that's needed is the reminder (as visible as possible) that content you are looking at is incomplete and you can find the more complete version on this or that URL or app. Same principle as if I wanted to eg.: design a "hashtag explorer" for the Fediverse. I'd focus on that instead of the posts (and pictures); but what I can't ethically do is prevent my users from discovering their existence.

inb4 Error HTTP 404 si sale electo KKKast,

Buuuu a seguir esperando entonces...

[Narrator's Voice] "Chile vota Kast"

Semana #46 que aún no me hago mi cuenta en feddit.

[DELETE FROM feddit /* WHERE condition */ ;]

PaaP! Platform-as-a-platform!

We exist, apparently. Always an adventure!

Might need to create an official alt somewhere stabler, just in case. It's just SDF has that special coolness factor to it.

I don't know how exactly people define what is or is not a thing for the purposes of "pseudo-elements applying to things" , but my first expectation was that, by design, :closed can not be the same as :not(open). The former would in theory apply to things, and only to things, that can have a state of closed-ness and are in that state of closed-ness, whereas the latter should be able to apply to things that may not have the possibility of being open or closed.

But if that's not the case, then I don't really see a point for :closed existing, yeah.

Eso es cierto... amd64 como plataforma es buena para muchas cosas, pero cuesta.