Should We Even Have :closed?
lambalicious @ lambalicious @lemmy.sdf.org Posts 22Comments 1,124Joined 2 yr. ago
lambalicious @ lambalicious @lemmy.sdf.org
Posts
22
Comments
1,124
Joined
2 yr. ago
"No podemos despegar con todos": capitán pidió descenso de 40 pasajeros por exceso de peso en Calama
Dineros administrados por las AFP terminaron en compañías acusadas de beneficiarse con el genocidio en Gaza
It is not possible to run multiple fontservers in parallel in a desktop session.
RFC 9557: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps with Additional Information
I don't know how exactly people define what is or is not a thing for the purposes of "pseudo-elements applying to things" , but my first expectation was that, by design,
:closedcan not be the same as:not(open). The former would in theory apply to things, and only to things, that can have a state of closed-ness and are in that state of closed-ness, whereas the latter should be able to apply to things that may not have the possibility of being open or closed.But if that's not the case, then I don't really see a point for
:closedexisting, yeah.