Me too, on the VIC-20.
I think something like the Commodore PET might qualify. Back in the day, I saw it used for everything from cash registers to accountants' workstations, but rarely for anything else.
I think that the original IBM PC was conceived and marketed as a business machine and only grew beyond that because of Microsoft's deep commitment to it as a platform and IBM's uncharacteristicly open specifications and design.
If not for that combination, the PC might never have left the office and most of us would have stuck with the companies who were actually breaking new ground, Apple and Commodore.
Florida House Bill 1 would prohibit children under the age of 16 from using most social media platforms, regardless of parental approval.
The social media platforms the bill would target include any site that tracks user activity, allows children to upload content or uses addictive features designed to cause compulsive use.
How would this even work? Let's take a closer look at the first 2 clauses of the second paragraph:
A student portal for accessing lessons and submitting assignments would require tracking activity and uploading content. If that system is accessible to students or anyone else from anywhere other than direct connection to the school LAN, then it would be in contravention of this law.
Or let's say someone puts up a self-hosted, restricted-access system for extended family to stay in touch without using a commercial or public system (something I'm in the process of doing). Allowing teenagers to use that site would put them on the wrong side of the law.
Brain damaged authoritarian nut jobs...
That doesn't surprise me. I have Haiku running in a VM, but haven't looked at it in 2 years, despite the fact I used BeOS as a daily driver back in the day.
Whenever I price something, I look at the whole package. If I like what a company is doing, I don't mind paying extra to support them. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose. With System76, I feel like I won.
They were the only company I found that was offering Canadians any laptop with Linux pre-installed. (I think Lenovo or Toshiba had something, but they weren't available in Canada.) Having fought mightily with various distros on a wide range of hardware for years, it was critically important that my new daily driver not suck up my time just getting it running and keeping it that way.
Nearly 5 years later, the laptop is still going strong. On top of that, my hopes for their distro have far exceeded any reasonable expectations. I was prepared for the likelihood that I would ultimately need to switch to another distro, but their ongoing development and contributions to the Linux ecosystem have kept me on board and excited for the future.
In the end, I wasn't buying a laptop. I was buying a system, and I've been extremely happy with the outcome.
That said, I suspect my next laptop will be a Framework. Again, it has less to do with the detailed specifics of hardware than in supporting a company in their attempt to do things the way I think they should be done.
How an elite clique of math-addled economists hijacked climate policy.
![When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics](https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/fdd5ed76-fe7f-4f1c-b7c5-8dd2a91d6e8f.png?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
Economics is not just the "dismal science". In some cases it's completely unhinged.
Is that all? I bought my current laptop from System 76 3 or 4 years ago based on my perception that both hardware and Pop were mature enough to be the only computer in the house.
There have been some glitches along the way with the OS, but nothing to get excited about. Notably, I've never had to burn things to the ground and start over. :)
There are some ongoing annoyances with the track pad. I don't know where exactly the problem lies but I do occasionally get cranky :).
Every poster in this exhibition is a failure—not in the sense that they failed in their graphic intent of communicating a message, but rather that they failed to successfully modify behavior.
![We Tried to Warn You! Environmental Crisis Posters, 1970–2020 | Poster House](https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/e4b27124-099d-42c9-9f49-047da75c80e9.png?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
A set of environmental crisis posters dating back to the 1960s, introduced with a quote from the 1970 State of the Union address given by US president Richard Nixon:
> “The great question of the 1970s is shall we surrender to our surroundings or shall we make our peace with nature and begin to make reparations for the damage we have done to our air, to our land and to our water?”
In my opinion, all of the issues portrayed are still issues and what progress has been made is tiny in relation to the problem and more than offset by further deterioration overall.
(Edit: note that some browsers (DDG and Brave on Android) refuse to load the site, citing some kind of global block list.)
When I was looking at 3D printers, my wife asked me if I thought I could make money with it. I said "not in a million years." She asked me what I was waiting for, then. Two weeks later I was printing the test model! Sadly, I've made basically no progress with "real" CAD, so I do everything in TinkerCAD.
Fine woods and metals are crazy expensive, but if you keep your eyes open and aren't afraid to ask, a lot of pretty nice stuff is available for free or close to it as long as you're willing to put the time in on reclamation. I just got a nice Schubert chokecherry log for helping take it down and clean up. I got some sheet steel and light duty tubing from some discarded BBQs. And I've got more poplar than I know what to do with. Poplar is the go to tree for yards around here and there is hardly a week that goes by without someone taking down an old tree.
my hobby is finding new hobbies
Sounds a bit like me. I just retired in June and am busy setting up my workshop. The original intention was woodworking with a focus on boatbuilding. As I go, I realize that I'm actually headed more in the direction of hobby manufacturing: a variety of stuff in wood and metal with a side order of 3D printing. On top of rebooting my programming hobby of learning a new language every year from before I "sold out" to Visual Basic and Access.
Don't sweat it. I used to feel the same way. Then, somewhere in my 50s, I realized that I actually had already been doing what I wanted: everything. "Jack of all trades, master of none".
I did strive toward mastery of most things I tried that I liked enough to stick with for awhile. I like to think that I generally achieved competency, but I know that I had a few bosses and coworkers who would dispute that. :)
Learning new things and having new experiences is priceless. If you can find that within a particular career, that's fantastic, but it's not the only approach.
I'm currently using the paid version to host my occasional writing and am very happy with it. It's not perfect, but what is?
One thing I like about it is that it's not just a blogging platform, but it's own little slice of the web. The home page is a list of blog entries from all the blogs sorted by some combination of "toasts" (likes) and age. (And the trending algorithm is both simple and publicly viewable.) I don't explicitly subscribe to anyone else's blog, but enjoy just browsing "trending" and "recent".
To answer the question a bit more directly, I would guess that demographics here skew a bit older than elsewhere. That is just a guess, based on the fact that sdf.org dates back to 1987.
Two big ones. I bought the VIC-20 shortly after introduction when I was 21.
Big memory 1: writing machine language programs without the aid of an assembler. I couldn't afford the assembler cartridge, but I wanted to break out of the BASIC sandbox.
Big memory 2: finding a military surplus acoustic coupler modem and using the schematics to make my own connector, then writing a terminal program so I could dial in to these crazy things called BBSs.
For anyone not sure what this is all about, CBC has a pretty good podcast covering the descent into medieval nonsense.
I had relatives living just a few miles away in one of the hotspots.
Thank you for sharing this! I've been looking for people who offer something other than hope, platitudes, and gentle transitions. Not because I'm suspicious of the "hopeful" position, or not only that, but to be fully informed on the issue of how to mobilize for concrete action.
I haven't read much of the relevant psychology, but my reading of history convinces me that humans don't act without an emergency. I see the challenge as being to help people understand that there is a real emergency, not a rhetorical one.
That, of course, is complicated by the fact that, in this case, the emergency isn't really visible until the time to act has passed. That means some consequences are now unavoidable, which is something that human nature has difficulty grappling with. As a result, it's very difficult to convince anyone, even those who are now living with some of those consequences, that the emergency can be anything other than rhetorical.
I agree. I have no idea what it takes to run publicly accessible services over the long haul. Hell, I can barely keep my sorry-ass website up!
I know that lemmy itself is pretty new, but I have to assume that the people who've been keeping SDF alive and functional for over 35 years know what they're doing.
Could it be that Stacer and file manager are somehow reporting usable space instead of "absolute" space.
I recall from the early days that there was overhead in the process, so that useable space was always less than formatted space. Perhaps that is still the case.
I've got people around me who say we in Canada don't need to do anything about CO2 emissions because, they claim, our forests absorb more than we emit. My response has always been "wait until they start burning."
I first became interested in social and economic theories in high school (early 1970s). The books available to me were mostly pretty old, but I was also very interested in comparing what was said in those writings with what I could happening around me.
I read Karl Marx, John Maynard Keynes, and their detractors. Two things I took away from that reading are that the economy must serve the mass population, not the other way around, and that, at least within a capitalist system, the population does not contain businesses, but business people and those people are just a small fraction of the population. My conclusion was (and remains) that governments must regulate business to prevent them from gaining power and must structure taxes and public services in ways that ensure that society as a whole benefits from productivity gains, not just business people. I recently came across this article that is an excellent starting point for cherry picking the good stuff from both theoretical frameworks.
I then read from the Chicago School of economics and the people in various fields who advocated and argued against it. From that I learned that there are those who would elevate business from being a kind of useful servant of the economy and therefore of society to the objective of the economy and therefore of society. (Something that I've recently heard referred to as "neo-feudalism".)
I read who I'll call the "social justice warriors". So civil rights leaders, feminists, prison and justice system reformers, unionists, education reformers, etc. The biggest thing I took away from that reading was that certain kinds of discrimination (say, Affirmative Action) can be temporarily justified as methods of reparation and correction of historical wrongs and the ongoing generational fallout, but that the primary goal should be the creation of a society in which privilege is not an accident of birth, health, or circumstance.
I read quite widely on ecology, but quite heavily on the difference between renewable and nonrenewable resources. It's less obvious than most people think. There are obvious nonrenewable resources like fossil fuels, minerals, and metals, but a forest is not renewable if not harvested in sustainable ways. Going further, that forest is part of an ecological system and ecological systems are not renewable if overly disrupted, so sustainable harvest is not just about planting replacement trees, but preserving ecologies, and not just for display and recreation, but for regeneration. The places we dump our waste are also resources and their renewability is based on the nature and volume of waste.
Some more recent reading includes things like Shock Doctrine, which examines one aspect of how disasters can be leveraged by those with the resources to survive a disaster to further increase their access to resources at the expense of those without the resources to survive the disaster on their own.
Some of my favourite reading comes from those who argue against the doomers throughout history. For example, it's trivial to find someone who says Malthus was wrong, but very difficult to find anyone who actually argues against the foundational thesis that populations, including humans, grow to the limits of available resources. That is, breaking new ground, literally or technologically, can never be more than a temporary solution. Likewise with respect to everything from social service programs and the failure of critics to properly account in detail for the actual sources of profits associated with privatization.
For defining and constructing societies that serve people, I think the best writers are found among the science communicators, especially those who focus on how to communicate science. They describe the methods by which knowledge is gained, validated and updated, and disseminated.
So that was pretty long on text and pretty short on specific recommendations. Some of that is bad memory, but mostly I don't actually find many writers addressing what society should look like, only that this one ain't it. Even thinner on the ground are those who address foundational solutions rather than specific changes in one element.
Hello all! I'm tickled pink to have my application approved to join this instance. I suspect that the bar isn't all that high, but just let me have my fantasy.
I've been online since I figured out how to hook up a military surplus acoustic coupler modem to my VIC-20 way back when. Through all of my BBS, FidoNet, Usenet, a couple of different computer clubs (including one dedicated to UNIX!) and a career as a programmer, I somehow remained unaware of SDF.
If I believed in such things, I would say that the universe is telling me something, because I just retired and one of my objectives for this new phase of life is to restore my "all things computer" hobby that I left behind when I went pro.
It's summer here in Southern Saskatchewan, so that means fishing, swimming, hiking, camping, gardening, etc. When I switch to my winter activities, I'll start rummaging around on the SDF servers and see where it takes me.