I like to point to Idiocracy (a movie you couldn’t make today but I saw for the first time in 2024; I think it was good) which Crocs are used as shoes for the future because they were not widely available and the costume designer said “There's no way people will wear them.”
This is a dude who thinks he can get a national broadcast network taken off the air for simply asking the FCC. Someone in his campaign is going to say something that questions the validity of this doctor and call for petitions to get their medical license revoked. I appreciate they are making an effort to appeal to the uncommitted voter, but sadly Trump is surrounded by people who understand what will make his base angry.
I’m not speaking from a place of facts, but I think the sentiment is if you don’t purposefully vote for someone within the two-party system that isn’t Trump, your vote will mathematically be a negative towards votes against Trump.
Not voting/third-party vote = one less vote against Trump/more possible votes for Trump
I’m pretty sure this is in response to a recent California bill that forces digital storefronts to disclose if it is a license you are getting. Otherwise the storefront is not allowed to use words like “buy” or “purchase”.
Because it is a fact.