Does retirement mean anything? Can they come back and stand in the election after this one?
"Dogs are responsible for around 30,000 human deaths per year, with the vast majority of these deaths resulting from rabies that is transmitted from the dog."
We have "Visit Rwanda" advertised at premier league matches so guessing it's pretty safe. Not saying the plan isn't abhorrent or anything
It retcons the nuking of shady sands by 14-15 years, so undermines the entire fallout universe they are faithful to. What a boring hill to die on
The quote you pulled detracts from your argument. It boils down to smarter people make smarter choices.
From your source, the section- 'Validity as a measure of intelligence' provides useful criticism of the iq test but concludes with:
Despite these objections, clinical psychologists generally regard IQ scores as having sufficient statistical validity for many clinical purposes.
Guess he won't be eating his own tomato puree then
Why has Charlie Kirk's face been edited and expanded to fit his head?
All the metal/wood working seemed to be metal work videos. Are there any devoted to just woodwork please?
It's the people that push to get their bags out asap. You also get the morons that can't sit down when the seat belt sign is on at take off.
Are you not allowed to stand up during flights where you're from? 15 minutes take off/landing & taxiying isn't torture.
This a UK politician where the NHS is not run for profit. Sumak is a shit who has had private meetings with US health care companies assumably to try to sell of parts of the NHS.
Got anything for DIY, plumbing/carpentry etc... please?
https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2006/dec/20/cruises.green
Not at all. This article is 17 years old and planes have only gotten more efficient whilst the same old cruise ships continue to so the seas.
Plus a more recent article
https://www.treehugger.com/what-is-greener-boat-vs-plane-emissions-5185547
The presenter focuses on argument 1 because he says the other points are "obviously correct" and therefore moral. Imo that's flawed.
-
Hunger disease etc are part of a natural cycle which controls population and ecosystem balance.
-
Luxuries are of no significance is not obviously true. Our economic system means that purchasing items of "no moral significance" feeds into a system which supports livelihoods and, in a functional government, provides welfare and health care to populations.
-
There are multiple areas where money could be focused instead of Oxfam etc which could be seen as moral- R&D, luxuries as per 3
(It might just be that I don't like philosophy)