I got banned from that sub for "sounding like a man" then when I told them I'm non binary and so should be able to post their according to their rules they didn't respond
He will either have simply forgotten, or the republicans will have fabricated some new crisis by then and he will tell himself "well I have to vote or the democrats will force everyone to be non binary and polyamorous!!!"
While I have my strong doubts and nothing will erase the harm of what's he's done already, I think we should encourage anyone that says something like this, especially if they are in a position of power. Sincerely hope shes able to make these words reality.
I like to think that in his personal life, Bush doesn't read or watch any news at all, but just keeps some guy on hand to inform him of major events exactly like this.
Did you only read half of my comment or something?
If anything you're the one confusing democrats with progressives here.
Democrats won 48 seats in the senate that year. Republicans won 50. And 2 were independent. Democrats did not control the senate, this is a fact.
As I've said in my last comment if you want to talk about party affiliationbto include Manchin and senma, then you don't get to include the independents.
Democrats did not have a majority in the senate, that is just a fact. You can argue against facts if you want, but all your doing is trying to twist reality to fit your argument.
Also using Trumps lawb breaking and fascist actions as proof Biden could also have broken laws and been a fascist if he wanted to is not only wrong, since the rest of his part is not yes men that agree with him being fascist, but obviously morally wrong.
Republicans have 53 seats in the senate whereas in 2020 dems had 48.
That and republicans are all spineless yes men who are in lockstep with the maga platform, they don't really have any """moderates""" like the Dems have.
the Democrats did "win" Congress in all but the most pedantic interpretations of the word.
No. Both literally and practically the democrats did not have a majority in the senate, if we go by actual part affiliation, then they only had 48 senators, and if we go by voting record then the DiNOs such as Manchin, Sinema and even Fetterman don't relaibly vote with the democrats.
The ONLY interpretation in which the democrats won the senate is one where you purposefully try to construct that narrative by picking and choosing pieces of the combination of those definitions to suit the argument.
And even then Harris still cast more tie breaker votes than any VP in history. So it's a bit disengenous to go after the entire democratic party when it was well documented that it was the actions of a couple of senators, the """moderate""" democrats that repeatedly blocked votes that could have done good from going through.
It was 50-48 split in favour of republicans in the senate (with 2 independents) less than that if you could the DiNOs
The only reason the Dems could do anything at all, it's because the VP can be used as a tiebreaker in certain situations.
Like the Dems are worthless corporate shills and only exist to give the illusion of choice to placate the masses, but you still need to be accurate when you say shit like this.
Remember when kid rock wrote a song for a children's cartoon and found it absolutely necessary to write a line about how much he loves raping little girls?
Completely the opposite in my experience. And I've even seen it where peopleb repost a story but with the genders flipped and Reddit generally sides with the woman both times
Please just go back to reddit