
Okay, but if theyre the one writing the prompt, changing parameters and pressing the button to generate it how are they not the one creating it?
And i do think photography is pretty analogous here. Anyone can point a phone camera st something, hit one button and generate something. It takes no skill or artistic talent to do so and the phone is whats doing all the work, but its still creating art. And just like AI, people can put more effort into it, coming up with a creative subject, fine tuning different setting to get the effects they want, or even using different devices/models to get different images, and retaking it multiple times to get something theyre happy with, then touching it up in editing software.
I mean i think i explained myself quite well already, and not to be insulting to you, but i dont think you're willing to accept any argument i would make that goes against what you already beleive, since your argument against it simply you asserting your own beliefs (that AI art isnt art) as an immutable fact
I think my analogy is more accurate
Personally dont think that's a good comparison. I would say it's more like taking a photo and claiming you know how to paint. You're still actually cre a ting something, but using a digital tool that does it for you. You chose the subject and fiddle with setting to get a better image closer to what you want and then can take it into software to edit it further.
Its art in its own right, but you shouldn't directly compare it to painting.
I was never taught what log tables actually are. Anytime logarithms were brought it, it was just "type it in to your calculator and it will tell you"
If she was involved there would be a tube attached with a gas mask on the other end.
Did I write this fucking greentext and then forgot or something, because this exact same thing happened to me, except they took my yugioh cards, not pokemon csrds
Same with using a calculator, no? Or not memorising log tables.
Semen has such a range of flavour though. Bad semen legit tastes like battery acid.
Eh, until we're truly a post scarcity society (if such a thing is even possible) scientist would have to justify use of resources no matter what the system we use.
I've never liked the guy, he's always seemed so full of himself like he thinks he's smarter than everyone and can never be wrong.
Again people loudly not understanding how AI works.
No, they are getting fed propaganda that these good policies are evil socialism and are therefore bad.
You're talking as if fox news viewers can think for themselves.
I thought california had a pretty big budget surplus usually?
Damn, i bet anyone that was involved in that project was super smart, and handsome too, probably has a huuuuuuuuge dong as well and I bet all cats immediately like them.
What you've done here mate is bake a regular loaf of sourdough and put sauce and cheese on the top.
And you're an absolute genius for it.
0 Fahrenheit isn't the same as 0 Celsius, so maybe the same could be true for feet too, we dont know you're whacky imperial measurement system works.
One of the ways people use chatGPT is like a search engine. Would you consider someone lazy and stupid for goggling how to clean correctly?
Well it's trained off how people on the internet speak so....