Western policy certainly paved the way for the Islamic revolution, but encroaching Western decadence is not the reason why they're censoring women's legs at the moment.
I don't understand why using the state's authority to intentionally and illegally destroy someone's life isn't being talked about as a capital crime.
If we're a country that supports the death penalty, we might as well put it to some good use.
I understand why the agents of the state won't talk about it like that, but I don't understand why the citizens don't start talking about it in those terms.
Go to conservative forums, all of the top comments are about how his politics don't matter, lashing out at "the left" for pointing out his politics, or lamenting the fact that politics are even brought into this terrible tragedy.
I won't hazard a guess at administrative/bureaucratic staff breakdowns, but you can bet your ass that the people who work inside the prisons, voted overwhelmingly for Trump.
Elect Democrats next presidential cycle and watch them do nothing to prosecute any of the criminal acts by agents of this administration, much less do anything to actually rebalance the economy.
Then watch them lose the following election and blame radical leftists.
That's my point, I don't use LLMs for those operations, and I'm aware of their faults, but that doesn't mean they're useless.
So yeah, I look forward to the AI bubble popping, but I'm still going to use LLMs for type of tasks they're actually suited for.
I don't think many people on Lemmy are under the the spell of AI hype, but plenty of people here are knowledgeable enough to know when, and when not, to leverage this useful, but dangerously overhyped and oversold, piece of technology.
Ask the model to confirm the answer and it will correct itself, at least when I've tried that.
I'm sure there's a mathematical or programmatic logic as to why, but seeing as I don't need LLM's to count letters or invent new types of pseudoscience, I'm not overly interested in it.
Giving people more, or better, health insurance, or raising minimum wage, are policies that the donor class feels comes at their expense. Either monetarily, or by giving the peasants more financial freedom, which they view as weakening their strangle hold on society.
They may have moral objections to marijuana, but enough of them also want to get richer off of it, so it's not the same thing.
So your proposal is to completely scrap how American liability laws work and create something new?
I don't think that would be all bad, definitely ambitious.
What about the the current victims? How should they receive their restitution in the meantime?