Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
14
Comments
1,561
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'm not making excuses, I don't even support this guy. And if I were in his district, I would take his religious beliefs into account and vote against him. As would be my right.

    I'm simply pointing out what is and is not covered by the US Constitution. The Constitution pertains to the government, not the people. It limits what the government can do, to include making religious tests a qualification for office, but does not say a damned thing about what the voters are allowed to consider.

  • He's telling voters what he'd like them to do. He's allowed to do that, and voters are allowed to take religious beliefs into account when casting their ballots.

    How would you even enforce a rule that prohibited voters from doing that? Particularly on a secret ballot?

  • That you don't have to profess any particular religious beliefs in order to qualify as a candidate for office.

  • It seems like he was urging people to vote based on candidates' religious beliefs. This is not a "religious test" in the Constitutional sense.

  • This probably gives Europeans too much credit.

  • The overwhelming majority of people who have been disqualified under the 14th amendment were never charged with a crime. That's simply not how it works.

  • If she actually believed her own bullshit then she would be GLAD that she has a more prominent platform from which to spread her beliefs.

  • Bush was bad. But Trump was dangerous.

    Like, if Bush were somehow to be elected again I wouldn't be alarmed, I'd be annoyed.

  • "The villainy you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction."

    -Darth Maul, Star Trek II

  • Principal Skinner was right!

  • Good. Very good. Do not enjoy yourself too much on Risa.

  • You left spacedock without your Halloween costume?

  • SULU: I'll protect you, fair maiden.

    UHURA: Sorry, neither.

  • Barely felt it in SF.