The fact that he didn't realize he's not addicted until stranded suggests that few Jem'hadar ever personally experience withdrawal. They receive regular doses and then die in combat, so it rarely comes up. Almost everything they know about the effect of white withdrawal is received knowledge.
If it weren't canon that they need white to survive, then my headcanon would be that that they could totally survive without it and they've just been lied to all along. Like that episode of TNG.
E-mail is a lingua franca. It's used not because it's superior, but because you don't have to worry about whether your recipient is using the right software setup to receive your message. It's the lowest common denominator of internet messaging and can only be replaced in that role by a new lowest common denominator.
A company that rejected basic email would necessarily be rejecting some percent of legitimate messages and/or increase their IT costs. While this doesn't mean it's impossible, it would be at least be a painful transition. Users will hate it.
Adding PKI just amplifies the software setup problem because now you have to worry about primitive selection, centralized authorities, key lifecycle management, etc. And there's no way for the sender and recipient to negotiate security parameters, so they have to be agreed on in advance, something basic email doesn't need.
PKI is too finicky and abstract for the average user to understand or care about. We can't reasonably expect them to make good decisions about a subject that even professionals and large organizations struggle to understand. A big reason for email's longevity and success is that the average user doesn't need to understand it at any technical level.
I've made no demands, and you're entirely within your rights to refuse me. But that just leads back to the question: "what are you even doing in this thread?"
You've already wasted more time making excuses for why you can't show me the data then it would have taken to actually show me to the data.
And if you think I'm out of line for asking, if you think my questions are too pointed, then you were never serious about achieving UBI in the first place.
But Great Barrington Police Chief Paul Storti said in a statement, “Because this complaint was made directly to the police department, we are obligated and have a duty to examine the complaint further."
I call bullshit, and would like to see the law and/or court rulings that support this assertion.
Because if cops have no duty to protect the public, then in what sense do they have a duty to take this complaint seriously?
If Putin invaded hell, I'd sympathize with the Devil.