to a significant extent, it's the euphemism treadmill, but the usual argument i have seen is that homeless implies an inherent/permanent state of being while unhoused implies a more temporary one.

i wonder which 10 years they think that russia had a democracy. like, whatever 10 year period they think is an utter failure of historical analysis. absolutely deranged.

i'm most of the way through Zelda: TotK, which has been quite enjoyable so far, but it's on the back burner now so i can focus on Satisfactory. I really want to get a train network set up in that, but it will be a little while yet before i have that unlocked.

there's not a whole lot separating most anti-civ anarchists from ecofascists besides better rhetorical slight of hand.