I would argue that you couldn't really get much less clickbait-y than the headline here. The only detail it leaves out is what the actual fact that was checked is, and that's because that explanation wouldn't fit in a title.

Oh, indeed.

My thinking also. Not that I think ranked choice is overly complex, mind, and I would welcome it over a first past the post system. But the March Madness bracket is easily less complex to my mind, so doesn't really get the point across well.

It's Edam shame when these things devolve into cheesy puns.

It's clearly a bicep.

Small orange mushroom, people are saying.

Transgender->Transgunder->Transgundem->Trans gunned 'em

My god, it was the transes all along! And they hid it in plain sight!

This story speaks very much to the contrary.

I'm guessing the election still goes ahead even if they get rid of Rishi beforehand?

Finally!

a

Cheerfully withdrawn.

Do you think any of those things you suggested are more likely than the cause of death being the knee in his back?

It's always fun to introduce someone to RAS syndrome, although your definition of fun may vary from mine.

If everyone doing it gets away with it, then is it actually illegal?

I've seen it suggested that he might call an election sooner than later, to avoid the possibility of this failing (more so than it already has), but there have also been several other times when it's seemed like there might be an election and nothing happened. Seems like Sunak is just waiting/hoping for something he can tout as a win and try to go into an election on the back of it, presumably in an attempt to minimise the losses. The budget certainly didn't do it for them, and I can't see this broadly unpopular 'win' being it either, but really what else is there that he can point to at this stage?

Dim and Dimmer

Reviewers aren't (or really shouldn't be) beholden to companies, the whole point of a review is to give an opinion on a product, and the less input into that the company has the happier I will be. At the same time, some reviewers do hold a lot of sway, and can strongly influence people's opinions with their reviews, so there might be an argument that a negative review can impact sales. However, so what? If the reviewer is bringing up their concerns or issues with a product, that is the whole point of what they do, and their viewers will want to hear about those things (working on the assumption that people will tend to watch reviewers they think align with their own views), and would be pretty upset if they weren't warned about the downsides prior to purchasing.

Doesn't seem like many world governments are motivated to even do that. It feels very much like the people in charge are actively avoiding having to think about these issues, letting them play out until it's too late, by which time it will be someone else's problem.

Seems like a great argument for addressing climate change as a priority.