Remember that the Council is meant to protect and enable trade. They only care about citizens for submitting them to exploitation.
If you discuss "the EU" you have to distinguish between Council and Parliament. The Council has no obligation to act according to the Parliament's wishes. They are not a democracy.
I've used both ProtonMail and MailFence for years. I pay for my MailFence account, and use a free ProtonMail account.
For my needs, the free services ProtonMail offers suffice. Their encryption seems OK, I don't store my files with them, and I don't use their calendar or their a.i. chatbot.
The only reason I pay for MailFence is so I can have SMTP access via a separate email client app. I guess paying for their services also gives more guarantees that my email address will be available longer. I care about the address I have with MailFence - not so much about the one I have with ProtonMail. If that changes, I'll probably start paying for a professional account.
Recently ProtonMail changed the interface of their iOS mobile app. It now is harder to sign out. I guess that's in an effort to push for more paid accounts. It's jarring conduct coming from a company that claimed they went non-profit. Clearly they seek profit.
ProtonMail also continues to email me advertisements about their own services. MailFence never has done that. Not once. In fact I had to look up how to transfer to a paid account.
Both services are fairly easy to operate and fairly user-friendly.
Not sure whether that is a c# specific challenge. Does c# not know the concept of laziness?
Haskell famously is lazy, and so are Java message streams: memory objects simply don't get created unless you use them.
I can understand that being a problem for trivial benchmarks, but I would assume a benchmarker to have that level of understanding, and otherwise catch up fairly quickly. I also had to learn about laziness when things just didn't want to do anything at all. The compiler just optimized it all away because it wasn't being used, as far as it could tell.
choosing profit over people again, are we?