All she can do is pull votes from Democrats handing the election to Trump.
the ambiguity of this syntax is fun! the democrats are handing the election to trump, and jill stein is trying to pull votes from them!
Is she viable with our current first-past-the-post system
viability is a myth invented by the media. hilary was viable. john kerry.
no, she's going to be on the ballot whether we have ranked choice or no.
i don't think that's true, i think democrats don't care about the people who are harmed when democrats are in power.
your falling for (or perpetrating) an informal fallacy called "equivocation". voting is not harm reduction.
harm reduction is recognizing the bad thing is going to happen, and helping people mitigate the consequences. it has a specific meaning, and voting is not harm reduction.
the analysis shows perot damaged Clinton's margin of victory.
demanding peace is not supporting russia. that video, also, does not support the quote that you bandied about earlier. can you source your claim?
that isn't part of how mussolini defined it.
you can vote based on policies. the real takeaway from that video should be that strategic voting consolidates parties while values voting gives you a chance for your values to be reflected in the politicians you vote for.
this, also, is not a source for that quote. your characterization that she supports russia is also not supported by what you just linked.
the only place i can find your quote is in a far right think tank called "third way" and the link they provide does not have the full quote they claim she gave. can you provide a source with the full quote?
Both West and Stein want to side with Putin and give him everything he’s stolen
neither of them have said that.
You think West and Stein care to stop Putin?
both have spoken out against his illegal invasion, so yes.
copying isn't stealing