Eh, not to be 'that girl' but the context of this article doesn't seem to match the title. What he's saying is that if the government WANTS to keep it's activities constitutional, meaning they will succeed in any later litigation, they need detailed information before each and every strike so they can make wise decisions.
His argument is that only HIS company can provide that detailed information...so the government needs to keep paying them.
Ragebait?
“Part of the reason why I like this questioning is the more constitutional you want to make it, the more precise you want to make it, the more you’re going to need my product,” Karp said. His reasoning is that if it’s constitutional, you would have to make 100% sure of the exact conditions it’s happening in, and in order to do that, the military would have to use Palantir’s technology, for which it pays roughly $10 billion under its current contract.
It's so funny. I don't think I've ever taught a dog our rituals. They always taught me. The most endearing one, I think, was my soul dog who passed in '21. When I came home she'd bring me her Kong with a wildly wagging tail. I'd hold out my hand and she'd drop it there, but she fully expected me to give it back. Once done, the greeting was complete, and she'd lay at my feet.
Get that shingles vaccine asap. My Dad is the most stoic person I know when it comes to sickness and he literally CALLED ME ON THE PHONE howling about how bad it hurt. Don't be my Dad, y'all.
All I need to know that companies are full of shit is this part:
How long do companies have to wait until AI starts doing what it’s supposed to do? Many business leaders expect to wait a number of years before AI has its intended effect, the study reports. Despite the fact that it’s currently useless, a certain portion of companies (3 in 10) expect to start seeing a return on their AI investment within a year, it adds. A greater portion (6 in 10) said they expect to see that ROI in one to five years. Hope springs eternal, I guess
What companies do you know that look farther than even 6 months? xD
Here's my only concern about this, other than she's a shitpile of a human.
If nobody supports her from the other side at all, her ultimate demise by the fascist MAGAts will tell the rest of the 'R's what happens if they fall out of line.
Think about that for a moment. Is that what we want?
You know the saying that if everyone in the world is an asshole, you might be the asshole? Well, if everyone who disagrees with you is a radical then....
Eh, not to be 'that girl' but the context of this article doesn't seem to match the title. What he's saying is that if the government WANTS to keep it's activities constitutional, meaning they will succeed in any later litigation, they need detailed information before each and every strike so they can make wise decisions.
His argument is that only HIS company can provide that detailed information...so the government needs to keep paying them.
Ragebait?
“Part of the reason why I like this questioning is the more constitutional you want to make it, the more precise you want to make it, the more you’re going to need my product,” Karp said. His reasoning is that if it’s constitutional, you would have to make 100% sure of the exact conditions it’s happening in, and in order to do that, the military would have to use Palantir’s technology, for which it pays roughly $10 billion under its current contract.