Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SO
Posts
0
Comments
345
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's like "fuck", it means several different things depending on context.

    For example, there's also the meaning of lamenting that people seem too cavalier, ignorant, or dismissive of something you feel is important.

    But you're right, the meaning in context is sometimes unclear and there are better ways to communicate your feelings.

    As for responses, you could always go with a polite "What do you mean?"

  • Just use your own brain and eyeballs.

    When I was coming up learning about the long slow path of climate change, it was "We have to act now, because by the time you can readily see the effects with your eyes, we'll be fucked cause it'll be too late by then."

    Whelp here we are. All we can do now is mitigate the damage however we can.

  • Jerkoff

    Jump
  • Sometimes the "realism" critique is certainly pedantic and unproductive, but other times what's really meant is contradiction. Situations should make sense within the fictional world. And in the fictional world of DC, norms around politics and economics are portrayed to be analogous to western neoliberalism with capitalism assumed and unquestioned. So with the Wayne family being a relatively well-regarded billionaire family like the Gates or the Buffets, there is still the issue that it is clear under the current system and that portrayed in DC universe that such wealth cannot be accumulated and sustained without massive exploitation of working class people somewhere along the line. So billionaire + "good guy" starts to become more of a glaring contradiction even in DC. But sure, we can explain it away as fiction with magically ethical capitalists. The interesting thing about the billionaire Wayne discussion though, is when people apply this fictional view of capitalism to how they interpret the real world. And now we're back to propaganda.

    What I would say that sets West Wing and B99 apart is sometimes there's a tonal difference or way in which certain themes are handled/portrayed that signals to the viewer that the writers acknowledge this isn't what real life is like but we hope one day we can get there. And it's a spectrum right. Some do this to varying degrees, other more propagandistic media do not.

  • They're invested in PC gaming as social capital where the performance of your rig contributes to your social value. They're mad because you're not invested in the same way. People often get defensive when others don't care about the hobbies they care about because there's a false perception that the not caring implies what they care about is somehow less than, which feels insulting.

    Don't yuck others' yum, but also don't expect everyone to yum the same thing.

  • This is not a generational shift. The iron dome of irony is a tried and true coping technique for the brutality of teenage culture where the rule of cool rules with an iron fist and being uncool means social death. And what is cool shifts at a moment's notice, yet uncool is forever. So normies learn to armour themselves by treating everything ironically to pre-empt any whiff of uncool. Because at the very least, it's never uncool to make fun of something. This carries forward into one's 20s when some begin to rediscover the coolness of being authentic, sincere, and genuine regardless of what others think. So then you have the reaction of radical acceptance, not yucking others' yum, respect for others' interests, etc. GenX had their equivalent, even Boomers. It's part of growing up. And of course not everyone gets there.

  • Well yes you are absolutely correct from a materialist standpoint. If you limit reality to material things, then truths are limited to material knowledge. Emergent properties such as subjective experience, society/culture, and ultimately meaning and meaningfulness are excluded from what is considered reality and truth, except for their material correlates. And this is why philosophers moved on from materialism because, while highly fruitful, it was ultimately insufficient in capturing all forms of knowledge.

    I prefer a pragmatic blend of constructivist realism.

  • I see it as a heightened period of different people "trying shit out" when it comes to new gender identities. None of these are necessarily definitive norms that will define future society. As with any aspect of language and culture, it's a part of an ongoing process of evolutionary change, adaptation, and discovery. Some might call it a church, some might call it a shifting paradigm, but it's always going to be a bit messy and won't necessarily make perfect sense right away.

  • It helps me a lot for getting started and staying on task. I used to use the countdown timer with alarm, but now I use Windows stopwatch timer with it set to be always on top so it's near the top right corner. Whenever I get an automatic impulse to open a distraction tab it helps me catch myself. I let it run until I notice I'm over 25 min. Then I decide to break or keep going. If I break, I set it to count up again so I see how much time I've spent on break. This seems to be a decent compromise for flexibility for me.