You leave my mom out of this.

If there is a god, it will happen on live television.

We already assume the actual start time is 20 minutes after the listed start time. Thank God for assigned seats.

My dissertation was funded by the US government, Greg. Can you milk me?

My beef with Dessalines is 10% his politics, and 90% that he's a power hungry asshole who uses development donations and pays himself to mod and occasionally make a commit. My beef Nutomic is that he's a transphobe and a liar.

Putting up with these clowns was one thing when there were no good alternatives, but now piefed is better than Lemmy in a bunch of ways.

Damn, a ban just for posting an article. Dude seems like all the criticism is slowly getting to him.

Lenis was kind of the source of the problem in many ways though.

Ah damn, I was a state actor who was going to smuggle in sleeper agents to perform sabotage and espionage in the US, but I can't figure out how to create a fake social media profile. I admit defeat.

I have a 14" carving knife which is considered a sword in some parts of Europe.

It's also not that hard to implement. It's just a slightly different algorithm.

Also it's not an industry scam - literally the only standard out so far is from NIST.

It really isn't though. It is thermal noise.

Trump has frankly gotten embarrassed at every debate he's done, but the media handicaps him so hard that the narrative ends up being about everything his opponent does. So of course he's going to do the debate. He's going to say bat shit crazy things, he's going to lie, he's going to be cringe as fuck and he'll probably say a bunch of racist and sexist things.

And the next day all the media will talk about is the time Harris sneezed or slightly mispronounced some word or some shit.

To prevent them from engaging in bad behavior.

So you can still ban the voting agent. Worst case scenario you have to wait for a single rule breaking comment to ban the user. That seems like a small price to pay for a massive privacy enhancement.

I don't think you do. Admins can just ban the voting agent for bad voting behavior and the user for bad posting behavior. All of this conflict is imagined.

This is literally already the Lemmy trust model. I can easily just spin up my own instance and send out fake pub actions to brigade. The method detecting and resolving this is no different.

It will be extremely obvious if you see 300 user agents voting but the instance only has 100 active users.

But if the only bad behavior is voting and you can that agent then you've solved the core issue. The utility is to remove the bad behavior, no?

Is that really harassment considering Lemmy votes have no real consequences besides feels?

You don't even need to message an admin. You can just ban the agent doing the voting.