Schadrach @ Schadrach @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts

0

Comments

1,369

Joined

2 yr. ago

A lot of the stuff he talks about like "inflammation" and "mitochondrial challenge" are like that - they're things that are real, but are also not responsible for nearly the variety of illness suggested, can't be treated in the means wellness industry types like to suggest, aren't as common as stated and can't be diagnosed just by looking at someone.

They don’t give a fuck if murderers and armed robbers get away with their shit.

They care if murderers and robbers get away with their shit, they don't care if murderers and robbers get away with your shit. Important distinction.

Vote Blue No Matter Who means they don't need to find a good candidate, and are free to ratfuck as much as they'd like during primaries. After all, the alternative is a republican, what are you going to do, convince 70 million other people to all vote for the same third party?

Criminal charges require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation alone is not that. You paint it as assuming women are lying, but you instead want to treat their word as damning proof unto itself, while people like Crystal Mangum, Tracy West and Wanetta Gibson (to name some who got media attention) thoroughly leave the reasonable doubt in place.

It's less bias against women (demonstrated by male accusers of female perps having even worse odds), but rather that it's an accusation of a serious crime and thus has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Which is complicated by very many cases having exactly 2 witnesses (accuser and accused) and often little or no other evidence.

The usual counter to this is to claim that accuser testimony should always be believed and should itself be proof beyond a reasonable doubt because no one would ever lie about this sort of thing, but that doesn't jive with reality - for example, look at the Duke lacrosse case, or Brian Banks, or Tracy West accusing her ex (to use a few that got significant media attention), or those exonerated by the Innocence Project (a majority faced sex crime charges). For the first two of those, the accuser actually admitted to lying, (even if Crystal Mangum waited until 18 years later while in prison for an unrelated murder and Wanetta Gibson waited until the person she falsely accused had served 5 years in prison and was on the sex offender registry and partway through his 5 years of probation and then had to be secretly recorded because she didn't want to reveal to truth publicly and risk losing the damages she was awarded from the school district).

It's not.

When something is marked up and marketed specifically to men, it's proof how insecure men are.

When something is marked up and marketed specifically to women, then women are victims and we call it the pink tax.

This is in no way new. 20 years ago I used to refer to some job postings as H1Bait because they'd have requirements that were physically impossible (like having 5 years experience with a piece of software <2 years old) specifically so they could claim they couldn't find anyone qualified (because anyone claiming to be qualified was definitely lying) to justify an H1B for which they would be suddenly way less thorough about checking qualifications.

Guarantee you she was hot relative to local environmental temperatures, especially compared to women with a current latitude below 60.

Thought they lost the trademarks to their name and symbols to a church they harassed a few years back?

I mean, you have to include the payoff to Trump, the lawyer's fees, losses from the merger corruptly delayed by Trump throwing a hissy fit, etc. I imagine all that kind of stuff fills in much of the gap between whatever the show actually loses if anything and $40M.

Not sure how that breached their tough guy firewall

South Park, maybe?

Cat: Pounces onto pillow at 5am “Wake up, bitch. It’s time for my breakfast. Now I’m going to meow repeatedly into your face until you comply with my demands.”

The solution to that is to make it very clear, from the beginning that you do not negotiate with terrorists but you do acknowledge her/him and return kindness with kindness. There's a reason my wife's relationship with our cat involves a lot more being bitten and meowed at until demands are met than mine does.

I get where you are coming from but this just feels like a semantics argument. Just because it’s called marriage in both venues doesn’t mean it isn’t already functionally exactly the way you put it.

It feels like a semantics argument because to a large extent it's a fight about semantics. Most of the people opposed to gay marriage aren't fighting the idea that gay folks should be able to see each other in the hospital, or be covered by each other's insurance, etc - they're fighting the idea that their religious ritual from their homophobic religion should be required to accept gay people and/or that they should be required to accept gay people as being in the same spiritual state as them as a consequence of their ritual. It's why arguments against gay marriage are only extremely rarely about the legal rights and privileges granted by marriage but nearly always about things like "sanctity."

Fully separating the legal and cultural/religious concepts of marriage, including in the language is meant to resolve that by ceding the semantic ground without having to cede any actual rights. You qualify and fill out the paperwork? You're in a civil partnership. Do whatever rituals you want, argue whether or not each other's rituals "count" all you want, everyone gets the same rights legally and the government is not in any way saying your rituals are or are not equivalent to anyone else's.

He is admittedly a good salesman. Most cult leaders are.

Once read a forum thread on "how your state/region is depicted in media" and had to point out that aside from one movie about a college the biggest things I could point to were the Wrong Turn movies (slasher movies about inbred cannibal hillfolk) and the movie version of Silent Hill (which is set in WV but based on Centralia, PA while the game version of Silent Hill is in New England).

Centralia, PA is one of those places with less than a dozen residents and a neat history. It's been on fire since 1962, the government tried to eminent domain all real estate in Centralia and a handful of extremely stubborn folks fought back leading to an agreement where they get to stay there for the rest of their lives after which the property reverts to the government via eminent domain. All seven of them. Five of which are still around as of 2020, having lived under that agreement for forty years. The church still holds services, and their graveyard are still maintained, even the one that's in a perpetual haze as the ground releases smoke.

It appears like most of Appalachia is under "swamp racists" and the rest as "NYC", which I strongly reject. Very little of Appalachia is swamp, it's mostly forested mountains. And it's far to rural to be compared to NYC.

STAR is complicated to explain to people whose eyes glaze over when you start talking math and also has the problem that you can't tell someone how their vote will be counted until every other vote is counted first.

People who like STAR tend to overestimate how much those things matter when it comes to getting public buy in.

That's among the upsides of approval voting - it's dead easy to explain and already works with existing machines meaning it's cheaper to implement. It's biggest downside is arguably that it tends to trend towards moderate candidates with broad appeal, ones that are "good enough" for a wide assortment of people rather than necessarily being anyone's favorite.

2 of those require a constitutional amendment which is a high bar to meet. Also personally prefer approval voting to RCV, it's easier to explain, works with existing machines, and eliminates the spoiler effect.

Where dafuq it stacks?

Jobs for my state's state government, for example, You get an hour of time off for every so many hours worked and they accumulate and are retained indefinitely up to a cap.

He is also a fantastic fiction author though.

His advice for people with depression is also broadly probably pretty good - my wife has issues with it and we tried a couple of his recommendations she hadn't tried before, and supplementing OTC l methyl folate helped her significantly despite not having the mutation that commonly results in it being prescribed. And his talking about ketamine being a prospective treatment with some good indicators in research led to the best drug commercial ever, for spravato - esketamine nasal spray for treatment resistant depression.