SaltSong @ SaltSong @startrek.website

Posts

3

Comments

626

Joined

9 mo. ago

Am I missing a joke?

Sure they can write laws making it illegal to claim the king of Thailand is a doddering old fool anywhere in the world. Good for them.

They have no legal right to enforce it on me, though. If I visit their country, of course, I will be subject to their laws. But they can't apply it to me until then.

They can write whatever they like, but in practical terms, they can only enforce their laws inside their borders.

No European law applies outside Europe. That's kind of the nature of laws.

You mean we may have seen this meme a dozen times already?

Except once they seven years when they become the most sexual beings in the trek universe.

Myself, I'd go for an Orion mistress, but not everyone is into the green.

I suspect that the reaction to the edited video spooked them. They were expecting to get away with that, and when it was so easily called pot as a fraud, they had to reconsider.

How is Lord of the rings not on this list?

A run of market sales would drive down the price.

And if you can't afford to rent, then got being able to buy is not a significant difference.

And what, leave the apartments empty? Have them earn zero money, rather than some money?

He may have finally shot the wrong man in the middle of time square.

I doubt it, though.

Do they not have flatbed tow trucks?

According to Seaspan, Moffatt’s EV was denied boarding on their barge because it was inoperable and not on a flatbed tow truck or trailer.

Most of that does not seem like it should be ICE concerns, but instead vaguely defined violations that can be twisted to fit whoever they need to disappear.

I maintain that bathrooms should be strictly segregated between "talking" and "shutting the hell up."

Back when I lived in N. Carolina, there was a local brand called "Dr. Enuff." Loved that stuff.

Because the English language is known for its rigid consistency of pluralization.

Insufficiently painful is what it is.

An interesting analyses. It certainly matches what we've seen. His attacks on the standard list of people is moderately pathetic, and quite predictable.

He's never told the truth in his life. How hard would it be to say "no, of course not."

The government should be obligated to shield them from the causes of climate change. But I suppose that ship had sailed.