SaltSong @ SaltSong @startrek.website

Posts

3

Comments

585

Joined

5 mo. ago

If you can come up with a better rhyme, I'm all ears.

History does not repeat, but sometimes it rhymes.

This is a very obvious rhyme.

Pakled.

Gambet, part 2, I believe.

That scene is wonderful, and gave me entirely unrealistic expectations for my workplace.

The article then proceeds to mention no other problems of any size.

There is no possible way I'm going to like this.

I am not interested in anyone's "interpretation" of Pratchett's work. It needs no interpreting. It's damn near a masterpiece.

So he's just trying to stop anyone from trading with us, is he?

I don't belive the headline is accurate, based on my reading of the article.

It looks line they area going to continue reading the food for safety. What they have stopped doing is making sure the tests are run properly.

I'm not suggesting that this is a noteworthy improvement, nor am I 100% sure my reading is correct. But I prefer the accurate information to the inaccurate.

I use my wife. She's an artist, and has an eye for such things.

Not sure how the rest of you feel, but I consider the "double tap" style of attack to be a war crime. Whoever pressed the button the second time needs to be court martialed, every person who passed the order along needs to be court martialed harder, and the person who gave the order in the first place, along with whoever came up with the idea, needs to be hung by the neck until dead.

Empty words should never be considered as a start.

I was trying to recall what I had from that company. Spirit island is a delightful game.

No policy in the world will stop minors from using the app. I can't tell you how many "I am 18+" dialogues I clicked on when I was younger. You want access restrictions.

Do you want to scan your id every time you open the discord app?

The second warming. Well done.

Can you explain the fringe thing to me, too?

If this isn't 3AM, then nothing is.

On the one hand, I suppose that depends on who is defining "basic human rights." I'm pretty sure the Trump Convoys would claim that's what they were doing.

On the other hand, the question was on riots, not on rights. Not all riots are justified.

I'm not saying I approve of what he's doing. Quite the contrary.

But it's what he's asking, and how he's asking, not that he's asking.

There is no legal basis for this fight. Do you pollen to start shooting tax collectors?

Glamour doesn't enter into it.

Speaking as someone too pasty to be bothered by ICE (for now) and who owns no guns (for now) eventually we are gonna have to show the country that a brown shirt does not make you invincible.