What an answer. Sources as a paragraph 22, prasing the benevolence of USA, "others are worse" and straight up artifical starvation apologia.

Its Latvia

No, GermanyIsAState, there is no Mind there.

Bibi blamed Palestinians for holocaust, so...

It was year ago though. Now places like .world are worse than sopuli.

Pretty sus for someone with Fidel pfp. It's not like they will thank him for that anyway.

Date format. Temperature is weird but unlike lenght and weight i basically never even had to really calculate it, it's usually clear from the context if it's hot or cold and it's enough for casual reading. But date is often delivered without the context and can seriousy confuse you if you don't know it's a murican one.

Usian weird measure system is one thing, it is at least easy identifable. But that illogical date format is just straight up fucking wrong.

Of course, key context is date: 17 june 1917. By that time USA was fresh into the WW1, and the implication of the 3 years of naval warfare included the fact that predrednought battleships was all but useless - slow, weakly armed, and very vulnerable especially to mines. And US Navy had tons of those ships which were incredibly propagandised (like in case of Great White Fleet).

So the US jingos of 1917, differing very little from the US jingos of 2023, were choking hard on the pill that their very expensive toys are just scrap and that resulted, except the usual screeching you could expect from angry jingos, with ideas like this.

Ultimately Washington Treaty from 1922 (signed accompanied by incredible amount of screeching of jingos from all included countries) just send all that scrap to scrap.

The idea itself is of course completely unfeasible from the point of engineering and also tactical nonsense too, which make that right side text even funnier, as you can see not only jingos but journos too changed very little in last century.

Yeah idk where it originated exactly, but the term itself suggest it was coined by someone actually having some empathy and brains, while liberals are famously lacking on both departments. Ultimately Engels is as always correct about the libs "These gentlemen think that when they have changed the names of things they have changed the things themselves."

It’s probably a measure of functional literacy

it's too high for a functional literacy. Even in well educated country like Poland with 99% formal literacy the functional literacy reach around 60%, so in USA it bound to be even less.

iirc the term "homeless" imply being a complete social outcast, while those people are in fact part of society often with jobs, families, friends etc. The only thing they lack is the physical house, therefore unhoused.

But as other posters noticed, the shift is also a liberal platitutide instead of action.

final refuge

Very often the first and only one.

imagine what “real growth” looks like

For them? After some scratching, this:

Communist Rasengan

Yeah same here, also with patriotism. It take me to (not very original) conclusion that only socialists are patriots, even those that loudly denounce any ideas of patiotism and nationalism.

Fun fact: for example, if we know them by their fruits, by far most successful polish nationalist in history was Stalin.

Nearly every single one in fact, one of the staple techniques was to depict important people as bigger, nonimportant as smaller and enemies a wretched and cowering. For example, famous stela of Narmer, the very first pharaoh living over 5000 years ago:

By the Rurikovich crest reason it's more of an all Russian symbol since Russia as an unified state was created by Ivan III, Vasili III and Ivan IV, three consecutive rulers from the that dynasty.