Skip Navigation
Are Nintendo's $80 online game prices a result of tariffs or is Nintendo just using them as an excuse to price gouge as corporations do?
  • We are here to discuss Nintendo's prices, not the economical system itself. This would derail the conversation too much.

    If you want to go down the rabbit hole, I suggest you open a new thread. However, keep in mind that the majority of Lemmy users will likely agree, given that this is a bit of a leftist echo chamber. And to make sure we're on the same page: we ARE on the same page. Capitalism isn't what we want, yet, it is what we currently have (and will have when Mario Cart will release for Switch 2).

  • The quest to fix the irony at the heart of every heat pump
  • In Germany, R-32 will phase out by 2030, they are replacing it with R290. R-410a can't be installed in new heatpumps starting 2026.

    It's confusing that other countries are apparently years behind, especially considering that technologies are apparently available.

  • Are Nintendo's $80 online game prices a result of tariffs or is Nintendo just using them as an excuse to price gouge as corporations do?
  • We all know that defining a price for a product across markets, regions, continents is more complex than "development cost", "inflation", "greed", or "NiNtEnDo".

    Factually, it has nothing to do with tariffs, and definitely has to do with cost and capitalism. Feel free to add what's missing, but please be complete, as someone will likely argue differently because of something you forgot.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NO
    Noerknhar @feddit.org
    Posts 0
    Comments 48