To elaborate on the second point, the US Constitution having been in continuous effect for nearly 250 years truly is rather impressive from a legal history perspective.
Nonsense, What you are claiming isn't even true.. The latest amendment stems from 1993. Your definition is based solely on some completely irrelevant parameter defined entirely to fit only one single country.
How exactly do you imagine that shoe is going to drop? It isn't going to drop itself, fascists will not relinquish power voluntarily. You seem to be either completely delusional about the severity of the current situation, or a disingenous liar.
Paradox of tolerance applies here. Your "argument" amounts to nothing but the usual right wing lies of "so much for the tolerant left". A tolerant society requires intolerance towards the intolerant. It is not that difficult to grasp.
Not necessarily harm, it is just wishing them the consequences of their actions, and for those chuds having consequences happen to themselves seems to be the only wake up call possible.
So you can slink right back in your hole with that disingenous nonsense.
I'm not American, so I know nothing about Dairy Queen. But you worded your post as if you unearthed some original burger from the 1960s or so, like you are Stevemre1989.
Nero has been pretty much redeemed in modern scholarship. The majority of the stories about him stems from slander written by avowed enemies of the Julio-Claudians (Tacitus and Suetonius in particular), later amplified by Christian writers who carried a special grudge against him. The archaeological evidence suggests he was a capable ruler, who carried out lots of large scale projects that were pretty beneficial overall, and he certainly didn't set Rome on fire and fiddled while he watched it burn.
Yeah, Americans love to fantasise about their beloved 2nd amendment (regardless of political persuasion), but they have never ever used it for what they (falsely) claim it was intended for.
There are lots of republics where the president does serve as a literal figurehead without any consequential powers, so a republic does not necessarily turn up with a Trump. In fact the US is rather unique in how it has combined republic with absolute monarchy in the office of the president, probably very much a sign of how antiquated the constitution is.
If you choose to ignore amendments, sure. But nobody would do that with any good faith in this nonsense discussion.