The consumer needs to actually experience it to understand it
šÆ so true
Apple has drastically cut production of the Vision Pro and may stop making it altogether by the end of the year, according to a report.
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/45581205
> According to several people directly involved in the production of components, Apple has significantly scaled back production of the Vision Pro since early summer, reports The Information. Luxshare, which assembles the Vision Pro, has been informed by Apple that production may cease in November. Currently, Luxshare is producing about 1,000 Vision Pro units per day, down from a peak of about 2,000 units per day. > > According to The Information, this decision indicates that Apple has built up enough inventory to meet demand. So far, suppliers have produced components for about 500,000 to 600,000 headsets. > > Market research firm Counterpoint Research estimates that Apple sold about 370,000 headsets in the first three quarters of this year and will sell only 50,000 more by the end of the year. > > Apple is now focusing on a cheaper model, known internally as the N109, which could be released by the end of 2025. Apple plans to produce a total of 4 million units of the device, The Information reports, citing a person familiar with the supply chain.
We recently asked Meta if it trains AI on photos and videos that users take on the Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses. The company originally didn't have much to
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20572903
> > In a previous emailed statement, a spokesperson clarified that photos and videos captured on Ray-Ban Meta areĀ notĀ used by Meta for training as long as the user doesnāt submit them to AI. However, once you ask Meta AI to analyze them, those photos fall under a completely different set of policies. > > > > In other words, the company is using its first consumer AI device to create a massive stockpile of data that could be used to create ever-more powerful generations of AI models. The only way to āopt outā is to simply not use Metaās multimodal AI features in the first place.
According to the latest edition of Mark Gurmanās Power On newsletter, Apple is still on track to launch the lower...
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/44758716
> According to the latest edition of Mark Gurmanās Power On newsletter, Apple is still on track to launch the lower end Apple Vision headset as early as next year. He says itāll cost around $2000. > > Apple debuted Apple Vision Pro earlier this year at $3499, but it seems the company is still quickly trying to figure out a successor. Some reports earlier this year suggested that Apple had halted Vision Pro development to focus on the cheaper headset, and that still seems to be the case ā likely because Vision Proās premium price tag puts spatial computing out of reach for many. > > Gurman says that the lower-end headset will probably use an inferior processor and cheaper materials. Vision Pro is currently equipped with an M2 chip, so I could see Apple equipping an A series chipset on the cheaper headset, like the A18 Pro ā which is about as fast as an M1. > As for materials, thereāll likely be more plastic involved, rather than fully being aluminum and glass. > > The report also says that the headset will likely drop the EyeSight feature introduced on Apple Vision Pro, which uses lenticular displays to pass through the users eyes to the outside of the headset, allowing people around them to still āseeā their eyes. It was a little gimmicky in my opinion, but an interesting feature. However, it was costly to have another display on the outside, and that display will be gone on the cheaper headset. > > Apple reportedly expects the cheaper Apple Vision headset to sell twice as well as Apple Vision Pro, which isnāt saying much. Apple Vision Pro 2 is also on track for 2026 with a faster chipset.
This creepiness is one reason why I'm sticking with the XReal Air 1. No cameras.
If AR glasses with cameras become popular, we're going to have to rethink how we design public restrooms.
Privacy will always be a major concern with smart glasses.
cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/18175359
> >Two Harvard students have created an eerie demo of how smart glasses can use facial recognition tech to instantly dox peopleās identities, phone numbers, and addresses. The most unsettling part is the demo uses current, widely available technology like the Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses and public databases. > > >AnhPhu Nguyen, one of the two students, posted a video showcasing the tech in action that was then picked up by 404 Media. Dubbed I-XRAY, the tech works by using the Meta smart glassesā ability to livestream video to Instagram. A computer program then monitors that stream and uses AI to identify faces. Those photos are then fed into public databases to find names, addresses, phone numbers, and even relatives. That information is then fed back through a phone app. > > >In the demo, you can see Nguyen and Caine Ardayfio, the other student behind the project, use the glasses to identify several classmates, their addresses, and names of relatives in real time. Perhaps more chilling, Nguyen and Ardayfio are also shown chatting up complete strangers on public transit, pretending as if they know them based on information gleaned from the tech...
It's annoying, I agree. But it hasn't stopped the Quest headset from doing well. The Orion glasses aren't for sale though, so it's a moot point.
I feel like Meta and Apple are stuck trying to give you a point and click desktop experience using a completely novel device.
https://www.theverge.com/24253908/meta-orion-ar-glasses-demo-mark-zuckerberg-interview
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/09/17/1104025/snap-spectacles-ar-glasses/
Canāt say Iām a fan of the monthly fee.
Snap OS has an interesting interface where the palm of your hand brings up a menu. I donāt think itās the most user-friendly approach though.
https://www.uploadvr.com/snap-spectacles-5-ar/
I hadn't heard of those games. Might be what I need to get in shape š
I guess $300 is justifiable if cycling is a hobby or athletic pursuit. Some people drop $200+ on a pair of simple Oakleys.
Love his channel, so many cool projects!
Maybe there's a way and I haven't figured it out :) Thank you for your encouraging words!!
I have the XReal Air 1 and XReal Beam accessory. I can't speak to the newest devices they have released.
For watching movies (e.g. Netflix, Prime, YouTube) and playing videogames, these glasses are exceptional as they act as a giant screen floating in front of you. If you have a Steam Deck, it's plug and play. If you have a Switch or PS/Xbox, you'll need the Beam accessory. Watching movies or playing games while lying down facing the ceiling is something to experience š
They can also be used as an extended display for your computer for productivity, though results are mixed.
XReal isn't directly compatible with all phones/devices, so you may need the Beam to use an incompatible device. If you use Beam, you can also pin/anchor the display to reality which works surprisingly well.
You can also use the glasses as a screen for Samsung Dex (turns your Samsung phone into a laptop with a virtual screen). If you set Dex's wallpaper to black, you start to feel like Iron Man.
XReal isn't intended to be worn throughout your day as a daily driver. I'm using it in a way it wasn't designed for. I'm designing apps for some future "perfect AR device" and XReal seems to be a good test bed due to its features and active community.
So for media consumption and gaming, I recommend it. For productivity, your mileage may vary. For grocery shopping, use at your own risk :)
Amazing! Would pair nicely with xreal glasses as a virtual monitor, assuming it's got USB-C with DisplayPort. I've heard of people using a mini PC like that.
When I made this post š but it's a guess based on my experience. I don't know if there's a way to see stats of when most people are on Lemmy.
I feel to maximize growth:
- Post daily at a time when most people are on Lemmy.
- Always try to include an interesting picture with the post. If you're sharing a URL, sometimes a thumbnail doesn't show or is uninteresting. In these cases, find a better picture and use that and move the URL to the body of the post.
- Shamelessly plug the community every chance you get. Speaking of which, !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
An EyeTap is a concept for a wearable computing device that is worn in front of the eye that acts as a camera to record the scene available to the eye as well as a display to superimpose computer-generated imagery on the original scene available to the eye.
AR glasses to go with your next phone?
https://www.reuters.com/technology/snap-focus-growing-ads-business-augmented-reality-amid-poor-stock-performance-2024-09-03/
Fair point, but if this was done using smart glasses it would make for an interesting experience, imo.
https://nwasianweekly.com/2024/08/augmented-reality-marriage-melding-theater-passion-and-high-tech/
https://www.henryford.com/news/2024/08/henry-ford-completes-first-spinal-surgery-using-augmented-reality
Looks like the grandaddy of this:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/virtual-and-augmented-reality-can-temporarily-change-the-way-people-perceive-distances-finds-study/ar-AA1pJmPe
Meta's Orion AR glasses to be unveiled in September, aiming to merge digital and physical worlds. Limited release in 2025.
!augmented_reality@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/c/augmented_reality
Honestly me too. They could even get rid of the camera and I'd want it even more.
Frame from Brilliant Labs
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iNFG6FIDCKQ
- 20 degree FOV color OLED display
- low power camera
- mic
- accelerometer/compass
- 6-7 hours battery with ānormalā use
- Software is open source allowing users to tinker with the device and extend its capabilities
- Costs $350
Features are pretty limited at the moment. Mainly revolves around leveraging a large language model via voice or the camera to answer questions or translate. I suppose their hope is other developers will extend its capabilities since it's open source. Ray-Ban Meta glasses don't have a display, but are still far more capable than this device, in my opinion. At least the price is reasonable compared to the G1 or RayNeo X2.
What do you all think?
Designing human interface guidelines for augmented reality smartglasses.
Website: https://www.ironsightos.com Mastodon: @ironsightos@mastodon.social