And It's Not Made Any Better By The Fact That The Headline Is For Some Reason Written With Uppercase Initial Letters
I don't necessarily think I'm a bad person and I have meet very few people who I think are "bad persons” even if people can act very badly in the moment.
And for you, I think it's kinda bad for your mental health going around thinking your a bad person and that you therefore deserve that bad things happen to you. But of course it may very well not be a problem for you so you do you. Being able to realise that your not perfect and maybe even flawed in some sense can also be a good trait for someone to have. Too self confident people can be really annoying
That probably doesn't count as "AI" do... It's more a very bad form of compression (that may very well make the image file larger)
It's very much possible and indeed such a problem that it may be done by mistake if a large enough data set isn't used (see overfitting). A model trained to output just this one image will learn to do so and over time it should learn to do it with 100% accuracy. The model would simply learn to ignore whatever arbitrary inputs you've given it
The white queen makes out with the black rock from A1 on g10
The problem with washing it is more with trying to scrub it then just submerging it in water. But as you pointed out it probably gets very brittle further out so you might hurt it if you try to scrub it
Judging by the image the centaura shrink with about a factor of two so the entire creature should be either infinitely long or just very very long.
I have so many questions about that freaking creature. Can it partially unfold to reach anything arbitrarily far away? And how would it go about washing it's infinite surface area?
Yes, those videos are awesome! You can really learn quite a bit from them
I've been building a breadboard computer based on Ben eaters. I'm however not using his kit as I live in Europe and the taxes/shipping to get it here was kinda crazy.
I just use the yellow one as I feel like they already represent everyone. I would definitely not feel any better about using a white emoji, I'd just feel like a racist trying to convince people that I'm better. I also like the yellow ones as it makes the standard to be anonymous about your skin colour. Or you could just use the outlined one for everything 🫥. Also the hole emoji is awesome 🕳️
And that was a way longer ramble then I intended 😀
And finally, good by 🖐️🖐🏻🖐🏼🖐🏽🖐🏾🖐🏿
P.S. Typing them all out the yellow one is also by far the most readeble. The white ones work very good on the black background I'm viewing this on but they probably just blend in to the background if your using a light theme. Maybe we should just type out all the variants? 🤷🤷🏻🤷🏼🤷🏽🤷🏾🤷🏿🤷♀️🤷🏻♀️🤷🏼♀️🤷🏽♀️🤷🏾♀️🤷🏿♀️🤷♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏽♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏿♂️
And instead of admitting you can not solve a problem prove that it's impossible to solve it
And hello from Europe (sweden)! I visited Korea last year and whilst I wasn't using Lemmy then those time difference really made it hard to talk to anyone who happened to find them self in Europe.
And for a solution to the problem, maybe there are some Korean communities with a bit more activity during that time?
Can it also just display a clock?
We have basic words for the numbers zero to three, so why not use them to count?
- None (0)
- Single (1)
- pair (2)
- Multiple (3+ but we'll use it as three)
So with those "digits" we can construct some numbers:
- Single
- pair
- Multiple
- Single nothing
- Single single
- Single pair
- Single multiple
- Pair of nothing
- Pair of singels
- Pair of pairs
And of course we can construct bigger numbers like: 42 = 4²×2+4¹×2+4⁰×2 = pair of pairs of pairs 128 = 4³×2 = pair of absolute complete nothinges For this last one I just use some adjectives to repeat the "nothing" as it looks really weird with multiple nothing in a row.
> The distance between Stockholm and Gothenburg is a single multiple of none multiple multiples
> Could I have a single multiple of bananas please?
And do believe that I, this random guy on the internet has a soul
I personally don't believe that I anyone else has a soul. From my standup I don't se any reason to believe that our consciousness and our so called "soul" would be any more then something our brain is making up.
Like just commenting a friendly joke, a compliment or something like that
This is revolutionising!!! This is the first time scientists have managed to separate out a single atom, encapsulated in a vacuum. This will allow amazing new technologies like, ehm small stuf mabey? This is Amazing!
I saw the opposite question asked here and thought it would be interesting to flip it on its head.
I can start. Linux can make arbitrary files executebel and windows (at the time I used it) could definitely not do that. ```sh printf "# /bin/bash\necho 'Hello world'" > HW.bash chmod +x ./HW.bash ./HW.bash
prints hello world
``` ^ something like that is just not possible on windows
I've seen .: used two times now, and I really wonder what is? The first time I saw it was in an extract from the Swedish dictionary SAOL in NE. They used it something like this so: > History.: since year x
More lately I saw it used in this comment by @nodsocket@lemmy.world like so: > What make bikes so expensive? > >R.: The willing of people to buy them.
***
What is this? Were does it come from? Should I use it?
***
Edit: thanks for all the answers :). It turns out it was actually used for abbreviation in the dictionary, they wrote "hist." instead of "historia".
Hjalmar @feddit.nu 15 årig scout, tycker om nyheter, politik och datorer (FOSS)