IMO yes. I hate PvP, but so many games these days seem to be about trying to ease me into it. "Well what if only SOME of the enemies are players??" How about none? If the game would be fun like that, I wanna play it. If there's enough people who agree with me to make it financially viable, devs should do it, IMO.
We'll verify every state of the neural network on the blockchain, for reasons, all of them good ones. It'll pay for itself by allowing people to invest and buy those unique states. :v
It was too good to be true. Pay a pittance for access to everything forever? There was no way it would stay good, and when it stopped being good the people who had paid for it would own nothing. That was my thinking.
Mhm, it's all about perspective. Moving the viewport or the content. The viewport or the viewer, for first person. Ideally you should always have the option to choose.
I still recall to this day, one of my university tutors talking about the C fastmath compiler directive: "I do not need a computer to arrive very, very quickly at the wrong answer; I can do that myself."
It's good to see that with applications of modern comp-sci we have graduated to arriving very, very slowly and at great expense at the wrong answer.
Heavybell @ Heavybell @lemmy.world Posts 9Comments 833Joined 2 yr. ago 
Not bad. My favourite of these is where he's holding a random DC power pack.