Both signal and molly are considered safe, a lot of apps use the same protocol as signal, most risk come from messages leaks before the encryprion happens.

Unfortunately, I'm not aware if they did external audits, but both codes are available in github.

The status quo isn't proof that controlling what people do is possible?

Seems like a problem of logistics, the controlling of public opinion.

I understand that is hard to not carry all the world problems, specially for empathic people.

There's a hardened "version" of signal called molly

I think undervolting is bursting out of the niche area now for some reason, I've seen articles about it in unrelated sites.

In my opinion there's not a meaning as in purpose, the things you said are what is expected, I think people exist just to be, to experience being alive or to experience death maybe.

Why are people talking about undervolting hardware now? It is because of Nvidia burning connectors?

Some affixes and suffixes also say the category of a medication or effect, they are very useful, but they are not based in the brand name, but the drug name.

It's a competitive salary, because it is a salary and you have to compete with others to have it.

Now just go to work and casually say " I'm feeling very senior today" .

It's almost as if there's a pressure on one, but not on the other.

Also because most phones have operational system's that are more secure than Windows, so a app is a easy way to block everybody that don't fit a profile of optimal users and avoid problems/hacking.

Companies dream of a closed internet accessible only from a controllable environment.

Welcome to Facebook the capital of Meta country, jokes aside, they are banning because it's a long term thing and they are scared of it derailing if too many people know.

I'm still waiting people understand that the way Trump treat Zelensky isn't new in any way, most people are just aware of it now because it happened in Europe.

These kind of problems are so complex, theres a lot of money at the top of the pyramid and they are often mostly men, if these extremes are taken off men are the ones badly paid, so the average men experience gets invalidated and they often feel worse, while the economical elite remain unaffected, just exposing the superficial company sponsored equality that are also advertised to women.

The glass ceiling that women experience is very real, that happens not just because they are woman, but also because of the capital, the stock holders that are mostly men will only favor woman that can be heartless as the position expect her to be, an behavior that comes easily when you are not so connect socially, as some men are. The woman who shatter the glass ceiling also don't do it unharmed, she often needs to compensate and often try to be even more heartless to prove they are better for the top positions, the worker and the boss both get alienated in the process.

The suicide part is a sad reality, men indeed die more from suicide, while woman try more is logically implicit that men cannot try more since they often die from the first try. It also sad that most men who die from suicide are old and white, men who feel isolated, often because they put all their value into work and do not have any alternative to derivate value from, so basically, also alienated from labor, after retirement a lot of them commit suicide since they feel worthless and abandoned for have put all their effort into money making.

I tried bring the main problems, without resorting to straw men arguments, it's such a shame that both men and woman deal with mental health issues and feel so isolated.

*Forgive me for my grammatical mistakes, I tried to be as precise as I could.