Skip Navigation
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 8th June 2025
  • This almost reads like tptacek doesn't understand why lucidity's piece a year ago was so effective and tried to write it from the opposite angle by punching down instead of punching up.

    I'd have thought that a guy who writes on the internet like it's a competition sport could recognize the obvious problems of this, but maybe I'm just a vibe coding Youtuber.

  • Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st June 2025
  • I don't get it, how is every one of the most touted people in the AI space among the least credible people in the industry.

    Like literally every time its a person whose name I recognize from something else they've done, that something else is something I hate.

  • Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 1st June 2025
  • Reminds me something F.D. Signifier said on a music podcast.

    Progressives are losing the cultural war in a lot of ways, but they'll always need us because we're the ones pushing the boundaries on art, and it turns out, no matter how ghoulish people want to act, everyone has genuine love of fucking awesome art. The true loss condition is being captured by the tools of the master.

  • eating our own dogshit
  • If you're referring to genetic algorithms, those work by giving the computer some type of target to gun for that's easy to measure and then letting the computer go loose with randomly changing bits from the original object. I guess in your mind, that'd be randomly evolving the codebase and then submitting the best version.

    There's a lot of problems with the idea of genetic codebase that I'm sure you can figure out on your own, but I'll give you one for free: "better code" is a very hard thing for computers to measure.

  • Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 23rd March 2025
  • https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/issues/50 and of course we already have chatgptfriends on the case of stopping the mean programmer from doing something the Machine doesn't like. This person doesn't even seem to understand what anubis does, but they certainly seem confident chatgpt can tell him.

  • Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 16th February 2025
    1. My big robot is really expensive to build.

    2. If big robot parts become cheaper, I will declare that the big robot must be bigger, lest somebody poorer than me also build a big robot.

    3. My robot must be made or else I won't be able to show off the biggest, most expensive big robot.

    QED, I deserve more money to build the big robot.

    P.S. And for the naysayers, just remember that that robot will be so big that your critiques won't apply to it, as it is too big.

  • Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 2nd February 2025
  • If they can convince the money hose that they just need one more OOM of compute bro, they can keep vacuuming infinity dollars. The incentive is obviously there for any amount of lying, but at some point, I assume even the most braindead investors will start asking around if this really is the only game in town.

    Or maybe they won't, which would be an admission against the core tenet of capitalism, but this has been a crazy year, and it's only january. :/

  • Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 2nd February 2025
  • https://www.wheresyoured.at/deep-impact/ And the companion piece on his blog.

    What I didn't wager was that, potentially, nobody was trying. My mistake was — if you can believe this — being too generous to the AI companies, assuming that they didn’t pursue efficiency because they couldn’t, and not because they couldn’t be bothered.

    This isn't about China — it's so much fucking easier if we let it be about China — it's about how the American tech industry is incurious, lazy, entitled, directionless and irresponsible. OpenAi and Anthropic are the antithesis of Silicon Valley. They are incumbents, public companies wearing startup suits, unwilling to take on real challenges, more focused on optics and marketing than they are on solving problems, even the problems that they themselves created with their large language models.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FR
    FredFig @awful.systems
    Posts 0
    Comments 78