FireRetardant @ FireRetardant @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

2,382

Joined

2 yr. ago

How can someone be a migrant if they are white???? /s

We have the greatest supply of resources of any country on planet Earth

This guy really is trying to sound like trump. He also calls environmental protections radical as if having clean water and air for our future generations is a bad thing. Sudbury still bears the scars of minings impacts even after millions of dollars in environmental remediation.

Maybe its only reporting official sales and also includes people who don't smoke at all. In my experience the really heavy smokers that could pump the numbers up are also the people still using black and grey markets to source their weed.

I agree we shouldn't care if some cry baby cries because someone committing treasonous acts is held accountable, but many of our politicians won't speak up about it because it divides us and it could lose them their seat. Plus our media conglomerates would blow the story up to make more people angry (good for business in media) and divide us further, with a healthy dose of misinformation as well.

Yea, that last quote is exactly why pierre didn't win. Don't let the media and social medias fool you, Canadians DO NOT WANT what is happening south of us. Some of us are upset with our leadership sure, but we know hate isn't the answer.

We know damn well our politicians are far too spineless to call this what it is. And i hate to say it, but with the current culture war, locking her up would make some of the right even more radical, they won't agree its treason and fearmonger the government is coming for you next.

Its why her supporters love her

Didn't ontario just say the cameras aren't effective and they need real cops to hand out the tickets? Yet the courts can't seem to handle the existing amount of tickets.

It seems to be more about holding drivers accountable for their actions. Its not like they've demanded jail sentences for speeding tickets, they just want legitimate charges to actually stick, hopefully with the goal of using that revenue to invest in safer roads and transit systems. Plus having more charges stick will help identify specific drivers whom are breaking the rules too often and should be suspended.

That thing should have a tether. As a general rule anything you don't want stuck in the hole its entering should have a tether or at least a flared base.

Just like our ancestors did thousands of years ago living off the land

Only if you have some evil socialist public healthcare. Privatization means you can charge the victims for the impact of shitty and unsafe infrastructure

Many police now use automatic scanning to check for valid registration or insurance. There are also some heavy penalties for driving without insurance. Something like a simple RIDE check (impaired driving check point) could reveal you have no insurance and you could face a lisence suspension. You could also be subject to an expensive lawsuit if you do hit an expensive car in an at fault accident.

With some of the politicians in power these days, it will be pushed as finally putting an end to her climate lies or some other bullshit culture war topic.

Thats the problem, on average rurally living folks tend to be more conservative.

Fear and arousal

On your point about drawing air in with the ac, most people without ac will try to use fans to achieve the same thing, often trying to run a fan from one open window aimed at another to pull air through the house. If you have multiple stories opening upper windows and blowing air out while pulling air in through lower windows is also effective. Adding a fan to blow air up the stairs can also help.

100% agree. If whoopi goldberg had chose their name for gender purposes, i could see them getting hate and being told it's a stupid reason etc.

It is their responsibility to ensure that everything beyond their target is safe before firing. This can become a grey area whem walls or other concealment is behind the target or when the target is threatening enough people that the risk may be worth it to end the threat, such as injuring 1 bystander to save 4 other victims from being shot, almost like the trolley problem.

"Our experience tells us at an early stage that there are some crimes that are unlikely to ever be solved – such as those without a clear estimate of time or location for the incident or if there is a lack of CCTV or witnesses.

"The more time our officers spend reviewing CCTV footage for these offences, the less time they have available for patrolling railway stations and trains, investigating crimes which cause the most harm and providing a visible presence across the network."

Well which is it, a lack of CCTV footage or a lack of time/police resources? They seem to flipping back and forth between these 2 excuses, even when camera evidence is available.