Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FI
Posts
5
Comments
186
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Well, a bunch of men are certainly forcing them not to wear it now. I find it interesting that your answer to men controlling women is to have different men control the same women.

    Edit: Honestly, fuck people who use religion as an oppressive tool. But, I find it really frustrating that people are acting like they're liberating women and girls by controlling what they wear. That's not liberation. These kids should be given access to confidential in school therapy and resources to report and deal with abusive parents if we're actually worried about them being oppressed. But that's not really what this is about.

    Additionally, banning the abaya doesn't prevent oppression. If these girls are being forced to dress modestly and being made ashamed of their bodies, they will just be forced to dress modestly in a vaguely different way now. Acting like this will bring meaningful change to these girls lives is just theater.

  • There are better ways to prevent oppression than controlling what people wear (which is ironically exactly what their oppressors are doing). These girls and women should feel comfortable and free to wear whatever they want, without being forced by religion or the french government. The answer to oppression and authoritarianism isn't more oppression and authoritarianism.

  • I'm curious as to how they even define and abaya. Like... Other than being a loose fitting dress made of a square piece of cloth, theres not much to define it. Dresses that fit the description are also worn by "westerners."

  • The top is a different post from a bottom of a dude just posting an ex ray of a cat paw trying to say how cute it is. But you're right, left shows baby paw and right is adult paw. Misleading.

    The response is just of a pug.

  • I got turtles in college for this reason. Not that they're really allowed either, but nobody will actually do anything about a turtle I've found.

    But they need an expensive tank setup and they live for a million years. So, don't get one if you only have room for a tiny 10 gallon tank. Plan on AT LEAST 40 gallons.

  • Riiight? Like, women shouldn't be hitting people for sure and there should be consequential. But men celebrating that women getting knocked out gives me the creeps. Honestly, if it was anyone substantially larger knocking out someone so much weaker of any gender or age it would be wrong. Imaging a body builder knocking out an old man or a small boy? Very wrong. I think everyine could agree there. But reddit just loves to celebrate this specific brand if violence on women.

  • That's fair, but people are experiencing no rate limits on certain apps and their bots are still working is what I am saying. As in, some api tokens have not been revoked. It hasn't been done completely yet, only in a targeted way for some apps it seems. Though, I actually haven't seen any developers say their api was revoked from them, only that they pulled out early as to not risk some weirdness with possible charges.

    The apps I am talking about working are not instances where users have inserted their own api tokens and do jot have api exceptions.

    Go over to the infinity subreddit. It's just a ton of people asking why the app still works completely fine without a subscription or charged api update.

    So, I think my original point stands. Many apps and bots work just fine because the api keys have not been pulled and api rate limits haven't been put in effect since reddit didn't make their own deadline to uniformly manage either thing.